Literature DB >> 21035364

A psychophysical study of endogenous analgesia: the role of the conditioning pain in the induction and magnitude of conditioned pain modulation.

Rony-Reuven Nir1, Yelena Granovsky, David Yarnitsky, Elliot Sprecher, Michal Granot.   

Abstract

Endogenous analgesia (EA) can be examined experimentally using a conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm. While noxious conditioning stimulation intensities (CSIs) are mainly used, it has not been fully investigated in the same experimental design whether the experienced conditioning pain level affects CPM responses. The principal goal of the present study was to characterize CPM induction and magnitudes evoked by various conditioning pain levels. Furthermore, we explored associations between conditioning pain reports and CPM responses across various CSIs. Thirty healthy, young, right-handed males were tested with a parallel CPM paradigm. Three different CSIs (hand water-immersion) induced mild, moderate and intense pain levels, rated 12.41 ± 7.85, 31.57 ± 9.56 and 58.1 ± 11.43, respectively (0-100 numerical pain scale) (P < 0.0001). Contact-heat 'test-stimulus' levels were compared before and during conditioning. Within the group, (i) CPM was induced only by the moderate and intense CSIs (Ps ≤ 0.001); (ii) no difference was demonstrated between the magnitudes of these CPM responses. Regression analysis revealed that CPM induction was independent of the perceived conditioning pain level, but associated with the absolute CSI (P < 0.0001). Conditioning pain levels were correlated across all CSIs, as were CPM magnitudes (Ps ≤ 0.01). We conclude that among males, (i) once a CPM response is evoked by a required conditioning pain experience, its magnitude is not further affected by increasing conditioning pain and (ii) CPM magnitudes are inter-correlated, but unrelated to conditioning pain reports. These observations may suggest that CPM responses represent an intrinsic element of an individual's EA processes, which are not significantly affected by the experienced conditioning pain.
Copyright © 2010 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21035364     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  27 in total

1.  Reliability of the conditioned pain modulation paradigm to assess endogenous inhibitory pain pathways.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Luke Heales; David A Rice; Keith Rome; Peter J McNair
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  Psychophysical testing of spatial and temporal dimensions of endogenous analgesia: conditioned pain modulation and offset analgesia.

Authors:  Liat Honigman; David Yarnitsky; Elliot Sprecher; Irit Weissman-Fogel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  A Mechanism-Based Approach to Physical Therapist Management of Pain.

Authors:  Ruth L Chimenti; Laura A Frey-Law; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2018-05-01

Review 4.  Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain.

Authors:  Janie Damien; Luana Colloca; Carmen-Édith Bellei-Rodriguez; Serge Marchand
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.230

5.  Effects of pregabalin on central sensitization in patients with chronic pancreatitis in a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Stefan A W Bouwense; Søren S Olesen; Asbjørn M Drewes; Jan-Werner Poley; Harry van Goor; Oliver H G Wilder-Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prediction of pain sensitivity in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Pernille Ravn; Rune Frederiksen; Anders P Skovsen; Lona L Christrup; Mads U Werner
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Understanding central mechanisms of acupuncture analgesia using dynamic quantitative sensory testing: a review.

Authors:  Jiang-Ti Kong; Rosa N Schnyer; Kevin A Johnson; Sean Mackey
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Pregabalin and placebo responders show different effects on central pain processing in chronic pancreatitis patients.

Authors:  Stefan Aw Bouwense; Søren S Olesen; Asbjørn M Drewes; Harry van Goor; Oliver Hg Wilder-Smith
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Sex differences in experimental measures of pain sensitivity and endogenous pain inhibition.

Authors:  Hailey W Bulls; Emily L Freeman; Austen Jb Anderson; Meredith T Robbins; Timothy J Ness; Burel R Goodin
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Is altered central pain processing related to disease stage in chronic pancreatitis patients with pain? An exploratory study.

Authors:  Stefan A W Bouwense; Søren S Olesen; Asbjørn M Drewes; Jens B Frøkjær; Harry van Goor; Oliver H G Wilder-Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.