Literature DB >> 21034687

Randomized controlled trial of interventions for young people at ultra high risk for psychosis: 6-month analysis.

Alison R Yung1, Lisa J Phillips, Barnaby Nelson, Shona M Francey, Hok PanYuen, Magenta B Simmons, Margaret L Ross, Daniel Kelly, Kathryn Baker, G Paul Amminger, Gregor Berger, Andrew D Thompson, Annette Thampi, Patrick D McGorry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive therapy and/or low-dose antipsychotic administered during the prodromal phase of schizophrenia may prevent or delay the onset of full-blown illness. However, it is unclear which of these treatments are most effective, how long treatment should be given, and whether effects will be sustained over a prolonged period.
METHOD: In order to examine these issues, we conducted a randomized controlled trial of cognitive therapy + risperidone; cognitive therapy + placebo; and supportive therapy + placebo in young people at ultra high risk for developing a psychotic disorder (that is, putatively prodromal). The main outcome was transition to psychotic disorder, with level of symptoms and functioning the secondary outcomes. This article reports the interim 6-month follow-up results. The study was conducted from August 2000 to May 2007.
RESULTS: Of a possible 464 eligible ultra high risk individuals, 115 were recruited to the randomized controlled trial (cognitive therapy + risperidone, n = 43; cognitive therapy + placebo, n = 44; and supportive therapy + placebo, n = 28). An additional 78 individuals agreed to follow-up assessments but not to randomization ("monitoring group," n = 78). At 6 months, 8 of the 115 participants (7.0%) and 4 of the monitoring group (5.1%) had developed psychotic disorder. There were no significant differences between the 3 randomized groups (log rank test, P = .92) or between all 4 groups (log rank test, P = .93). There was also no difference between the 4 groups in secondary measures, with all groups showing a reduction in symptoms and increased functioning.
CONCLUSIONS: Rates of transition to psychosis were lower than expected, particularly in the control supportive therapy + placebo group. This may have accounted for the negative finding, as the sample was therefore underpowered to find any difference between groups. Alternatively, it may be that all treatments were equally effective or equally ineffective at 6 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN012605000247673. © Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21034687     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.08m04979ora

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  37 in total

1.  [Should antipsychotics be used in prodromal stages of schizophrenia to prevent psychosis? Pro].

Authors:  M Lambert; C Correll
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  Supportive therapy for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lucy A Buckley; Nicola Maayan; Karla Soares-Weiser; Clive E Adams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-14

3.  Staged Treatment in Early Psychosis: A sequential multiple assignment randomised trial of interventions for ultra high risk of psychosis patients.

Authors:  Barnaby Nelson; G Paul Amminger; Hok Pan Yuen; Nicky Wallis; Melissa J Kerr; Lisa Dixon; Cameron Carter; Rachel Loewy; Tara A Niendam; Martha Shumway; Sarah Morris; Julie Blasioli; Patrick D McGorry
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.732

Review 4.  Psychosis prediction and clinical utility in familial high-risk studies: selective review, synthesis, and implications for early detection and intervention.

Authors:  Jai L Shah; Neeraj Tandon; Matcheri S Keshavan
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.732

5.  Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cathy Davies; Andrea Cipriani; John P A Ioannidis; Joaquim Radua; Daniel Stahl; Umberto Provenzani; Philip McGuire; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 49.548

6.  Family-focused treatment for adolescents and young adults at high risk for psychosis: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  David J Miklowitz; Mary P O'Brien; Danielle A Schlosser; Jean Addington; Kristin A Candan; Catherine Marshall; Isabel Domingues; Barbara C Walsh; Jamie L Zinberg; Sandra D De Silva; Michelle Friedman-Yakoobian; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 7.  Antipsychotic interventions in prodromal psychosis: safety issues.

Authors:  Chen-Chung Liu; Arsime Demjaha
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy Programs for Schizophrenia: Results of a Short-Term Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Oya Mortan Sevi; Serap Tekinsav Sutcu; Sema Yesilyurt; Sultan Turan Eroglu; Busra Gunes
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2019-08-29

9.  The 'at-risk mental state' for psychosis in adolescents: clinical presentation, transition and remission.

Authors:  Patrick Welsh; Paul A Tiffin
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2014-02

10.  Early psychosis research at Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health.

Authors:  S M Cotton; K M Filia; A Ratheesh; K Pennell; S Goldstone; P D McGorry
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.