BACKGROUND: Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and outbreaks occur in correctional facilities, such as jails and prisons. Spread of these infections can be extremely difficult to control. Development of effective prevention protocols requires an understanding of MRSA risk factors in incarcerated persons. METHODS: We performed a case-control study investigating behavioral risk factors associated with MRSA infection and colonization. Case patients were male inmates with confirmed MRSA infection. Control subjects were male inmates without skin infection. Case patients and control subjects completed questionnaires and underwent collection of nasal swab samples for culture for MRSA. Microbiologic analysis was performed to characterize recovered MRSA isolates. RESULTS: We enrolled 60 case patients and 102 control subjects. Of the case patients, 21 (35%) had MRSA nasal colonization, compared with 11 control subjects (11%) (P .001). Among MRSA isolates tested, 100% were the USA300 strain type. Factors associated with MRSA skin infection included MRSA nares colonization, lower educational level, lack of knowledge about "Staph" infections, lower rate of showering in jail, recent skin infection, sharing soap with other inmates, and less preincarceration contact with the health care system. Risk factors associated with MRSA colonization included antibiotic use in the previous year and lower rate of showering. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several risks for MRSA infection in male inmates, many of which reflected preincarceration factors, such as previous skin infection and lower educational level. Some mutable factors, such as showering frequency, knowledge about Staph, and soap sharing, may be targets for intervention to prevent infection in this vulnerable population.
BACKGROUND: Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and outbreaks occur in correctional facilities, such as jails and prisons. Spread of these infections can be extremely difficult to control. Development of effective prevention protocols requires an understanding of MRSA risk factors in incarcerated persons. METHODS: We performed a case-control study investigating behavioral risk factors associated with MRSA infection and colonization. Case patients were male inmates with confirmed MRSA infection. Control subjects were male inmates without skin infection. Case patients and control subjects completed questionnaires and underwent collection of nasal swab samples for culture for MRSA. Microbiologic analysis was performed to characterize recovered MRSA isolates. RESULTS: We enrolled 60 case patients and 102 control subjects. Of the case patients, 21 (35%) had MRSA nasal colonization, compared with 11 control subjects (11%) (P .001). Among MRSA isolates tested, 100% were the USA300 strain type. Factors associated with MRSA skin infection included MRSA nares colonization, lower educational level, lack of knowledge about "Staph" infections, lower rate of showering in jail, recent skin infection, sharing soap with other inmates, and less preincarceration contact with the health care system. Risk factors associated with MRSA colonization included antibiotic use in the previous year and lower rate of showering. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several risks for MRSA infection in male inmates, many of which reflected preincarceration factors, such as previous skin infection and lower educational level. Some mutable factors, such as showering frequency, knowledge about Staph, and soap sharing, may be targets for intervention to prevent infection in this vulnerable population.
Authors: Alia A Al-Tayyib; Susan M Rogers; James N Gribble; Maria Villarroel; Charles F Turner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: G Lina; Y Piémont; F Godail-Gamot; M Bes; M O Peter; V Gauduchon; F Vandenesch; J Etienne Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Cheryl L Main; Padman Jayaratne; Allan Haley; Candy Rutherford; Fiona Smaill; David N Fisman Journal: Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.471
Authors: Timothy S Naimi; Kathleen H LeDell; Kathryn Como-Sabetti; Stephanie M Borchardt; David J Boxrud; Jerome Etienne; Susan K Johnson; Francois Vandenesch; Scott Fridkin; Carol O'Boyle; Richard N Danila; Ruth Lynfield Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-12-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Linda K McDougal; Christine D Steward; George E Killgore; Jasmine M Chaitram; Sigrid K McAllister; Fred C Tenover Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Kyle J Popovich; Evan Snitkin; Stefan J Green; Alla Aroutcheva; Mary K Hayden; Bala Hota; Robert A Weinstein Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Michael Z David; Jane D Siegel; Janet Henderson; Greg Leos; Kaming Lo; Jerry Iwuora; Alexis R Taylor; Diana L Zychowski; Esmaeil Porsa; Susan Boyle-Vavra; Robert S Daum Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2014-06-23 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Benjamin A Miko; Montina Befus; Carolyn T A Herzig; Dhritiman V Mukherjee; Zoltan L Apa; Ruo Yu Bai; Joshua P Tanner; Dana Gage; Maryann Genovese; Carl J Koenigsmann; Elaine L Larson; Franklin D Lowy Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: D V Mukherjee; C T A Herzig; C Y Jeon; C J Lee; Z L Apa; M Genovese; D Gage; C J Koenigsmann; F D Lowy; E L Larson Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Loren G Miller; Samantha J Eells; Alexis R Taylor; Michael Z David; Nancy Ortiz; Diana Zychowski; Neha Kumar; Denise Cruz; Susan Boyle-Vavra; Robert S Daum Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 9.079