Justin J Waring1, Simon Bishop. 1. Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. justin.waring@nottingham.ac.uk
Abstract
PURPOSE: This paper seeks to identify the instances of informal knowledge sharing at the "backstage" of the clinical environment and to demonstrate their contribution to organisational learning and patient safety. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The approach takes the form of an ethnographic study in two Day Surgery Units in the UK National Health Service undertaken over three months in various clinical and non-clinical settings. The observations recorded the instances of communication and knowledge sharing, as well as taking into account the wider socio-cultural and organisational context. FINDINGS: The study identified situations of informal knowledge sharing. These were characterised by degrees of homogeneity/heterogeneity and patency/privacy. Focusing on three sites--staff lounge, storeroom, and theatre corridor, the paper elaborates the context and content of knowledge sharing, and the contributions to clinical practice, service function and learning. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Backstage knowledge sharing is premised on shared understanding, trust and mutuality and situational opportunity. This contrasts with more formal models of learning advocated in policy. Services managers might embrace, rather than replace, these relationships, whilst emphasising the need for knowledge to be shared more widely amongst peers and service leaders. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To date, little research in the area of patient safety has considered the contribution of informal learning at the "backstage". This is an important, if taken-for-granted, part of everyday practice and makes a "hidden" contribution to organisational learning.
PURPOSE: This paper seeks to identify the instances of informal knowledge sharing at the "backstage" of the clinical environment and to demonstrate their contribution to organisational learning and patient safety. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The approach takes the form of an ethnographic study in two Day Surgery Units in the UK National Health Service undertaken over three months in various clinical and non-clinical settings. The observations recorded the instances of communication and knowledge sharing, as well as taking into account the wider socio-cultural and organisational context. FINDINGS: The study identified situations of informal knowledge sharing. These were characterised by degrees of homogeneity/heterogeneity and patency/privacy. Focusing on three sites--staff lounge, storeroom, and theatre corridor, the paper elaborates the context and content of knowledge sharing, and the contributions to clinical practice, service function and learning. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Backstage knowledge sharing is premised on shared understanding, trust and mutuality and situational opportunity. This contrasts with more formal models of learning advocated in policy. Services managers might embrace, rather than replace, these relationships, whilst emphasising the need for knowledge to be shared more widely amongst peers and service leaders. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To date, little research in the area of patient safety has considered the contribution of informal learning at the "backstage". This is an important, if taken-for-granted, part of everyday practice and makes a "hidden" contribution to organisational learning.
Authors: Elisa Liberati; Natalie Richards; Janet Willars; David Scott; Nicola Boydell; Jennie Parker; Vanessa Pinfold; Graham Martin; Mary Dixon-Woods; Peter B Jones Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Louise Locock; Catherine Montgomery; Stephen Parkin; Alison Chisholm; Jennifer Bostock; Sue Dopson; Melanie Gager; Elizabeth Gibbons; Chris Graham; Jenny King; Angela Martin; John Powell; Sue Ziebland Journal: J Health Serv Res Policy Date: 2020-02-14
Authors: Elisa G Liberati; Carolyn Tarrant; Janet Willars; Tim Draycott; Cathy Winter; Sarah Chew; Mary Dixon-Woods Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Archontissa Maria Kanavaki; Courtney Jane Lightfoot; Jared Palmer; Thomas James Wilkinson; Alice Caroline Smith; Ceri Rhiannon Jones Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Samantha Machen; Yogini Jani; Simon Turner; Martin Marshall; Naomi J Fulop Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2019-12-31 Impact factor: 2.038