OBJECTIVE: Seizure is the presenting symptom in most of World Health Organization grade II gliomas (GIIGs). Rarely, a GIIG is discovered incidentally on imaging. Little is known about the natural course and prognosis of incidental GIIGs. The aim of the present study is to characterize their natural history and to investigate whether their clinical and radiological behaviors differ from those of symptomatic GIIGs. METHODS: The clinical and radiological findings, treatments, and outcomes of 47 histologically-proven incidental GIIGs were compared with those of 1249 symptomatic GIIGs. RESULTS: Incidental GIIGs differ significantly from symptomatic GIIGs: they have a female predominance (p = 0.05), smaller initial tumor volumes (p < 0.001), lower incidence of contrast enhancement (p = 0.009), and are more likely to undergo gross total surgical removal (p < 0.001). Proliferation rates were similar to that observed among symptomatic GIIGs. Younger age at the time of discovery, frontal lobes, and noneloquent brain regions were associated with incidental GIIGs, as compared to their symptomatic counterparts. When not treated, incidental GIIGs demonstrated radiological growth (median velocity of diametric expansion at 3.5 mm/year), and became symptomatic at a median interval of 48 months after radiological discovery. Overall, incidental discovery was associated with a significant survival benefit (p = 0.04). INTERPRETATION: Incidental GIIGs are progressive tumors leading to clinical transformation toward symptomatic GIIGs. They may represent an earlier step in the natural history of a glioma than the symptomatic GIIGs.
OBJECTIVE:Seizure is the presenting symptom in most of World Health Organization grade II gliomas (GIIGs). Rarely, a GIIG is discovered incidentally on imaging. Little is known about the natural course and prognosis of incidental GIIGs. The aim of the present study is to characterize their natural history and to investigate whether their clinical and radiological behaviors differ from those of symptomatic GIIGs. METHODS: The clinical and radiological findings, treatments, and outcomes of 47 histologically-proven incidental GIIGs were compared with those of 1249 symptomatic GIIGs. RESULTS: Incidental GIIGs differ significantly from symptomatic GIIGs: they have a female predominance (p = 0.05), smaller initial tumor volumes (p < 0.001), lower incidence of contrast enhancement (p = 0.009), and are more likely to undergo gross total surgical removal (p < 0.001). Proliferation rates were similar to that observed among symptomatic GIIGs. Younger age at the time of discovery, frontal lobes, and noneloquent brain regions were associated with incidental GIIGs, as compared to their symptomatic counterparts. When not treated, incidental GIIGs demonstrated radiological growth (median velocity of diametric expansion at 3.5 mm/year), and became symptomatic at a median interval of 48 months after radiological discovery. Overall, incidental discovery was associated with a significant survival benefit (p = 0.04). INTERPRETATION: Incidental GIIGs are progressive tumors leading to clinical transformation toward symptomatic GIIGs. They may represent an earlier step in the natural history of a glioma than the symptomatic GIIGs.
Authors: C Gerin; J Pallud; B Grammaticos; E Mandonnet; C Deroulers; P Varlet; L Capelle; L Taillandier; L Bauchet; H Duffau; M Badoual Journal: Cell Prolif Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 6.831
Authors: Doniel Drazin; Kevin Spitler; Milos Cekic; Ashish Patel; George Hanna; Ali Shirzadi; Ray Chu Journal: Sci Eng Ethics Date: 2012-10-13 Impact factor: 3.525
Authors: David Schiff; Martin Van den Bent; Michael A Vogelbaum; Wolfgang Wick; C Ryan Miller; Martin Taphoorn; Whitney Pope; Paul D Brown; Michael Platten; Rakesh Jalali; Terri Armstrong; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-07-11 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Hans Kristian Bø; Ole Solheim; Asgeir Store Jakola; Kjell-Arne Kvistad; Ingerid Reinertsen; Erik Magnus Berntsen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 4.130