BACKGROUND: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) plays an important role in DNA replication and repair. The expression and potential utility of this marker in prostatic neoplasia is uncertain. With the development of this new caPCNA selective antibody, we explored the potential utility of this marker in prostate cancer. METHODS: Using a traditional primary Fab2' rabbit anti-caPCNA antibody-HRP conjugated secondary anti-Fab2' antibody format, the expression of the caPCNA was analyzed in prostate tissue from 89 radical prostatectomy specimens. The caPCNA expression was correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics. RESULTS: The fraction of cells staining positively with caPCNA antibody in prostatic adenocarcinoma (mean, 23%) was significantly higher than that in benign prostatic epithelium (mean, 2%; P < 0.001) or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) (mean, 6%; P < 0.05). Moreover, the intensity of caPCNA expression in prostatic adenocarcinoma (mean, 2.9) was significantly higher than that in benign prostatic tissue (mean, 0.7; P < 0.001) or high-grade PIN (mean, 2.0; P < 0.001). Benign prostatic epithelium showed only minimal or negative reactivity. There was significant correlation between the percentage of caPCNA expression and primary Gleason grade (P = 0.01), and with Gleason score (P = 0.02). Adenocarcinomas with positive vascular invasion had a significantly higher percentage of cells staining with caPCNA antibody (P < 0.0001) and a higher intensity of caPCNA expression (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that increased expression of the cancer-associated isoform of PCNA is common in prostatic adenocarcinoma and its precursor and may be a useful biomarker.
BACKGROUND:Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) plays an important role in DNA replication and repair. The expression and potential utility of this marker in prostatic neoplasia is uncertain. With the development of this new caPCNA selective antibody, we explored the potential utility of this marker in prostate cancer. METHODS: Using a traditional primary Fab2' rabbit anti-caPCNA antibody-HRP conjugated secondary anti-Fab2' antibody format, the expression of the caPCNA was analyzed in prostate tissue from 89 radical prostatectomy specimens. The caPCNA expression was correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics. RESULTS: The fraction of cells staining positively with caPCNA antibody in prostatic adenocarcinoma (mean, 23%) was significantly higher than that in benign prostatic epithelium (mean, 2%; P < 0.001) or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) (mean, 6%; P < 0.05). Moreover, the intensity of caPCNA expression in prostatic adenocarcinoma (mean, 2.9) was significantly higher than that in benign prostatic tissue (mean, 0.7; P < 0.001) or high-grade PIN (mean, 2.0; P < 0.001). Benign prostatic epithelium showed only minimal or negative reactivity. There was significant correlation between the percentage of caPCNA expression and primary Gleason grade (P = 0.01), and with Gleason score (P = 0.02). Adenocarcinomas with positive vascular invasion had a significantly higher percentage of cells staining with caPCNA antibody (P < 0.0001) and a higher intensity of caPCNA expression (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that increased expression of the cancer-associated isoform of PCNA is common in prostatic adenocarcinoma and its precursor and may be a useful biomarker.
Authors: L Morell-Quadreny; F Clar-Blanch; B Fenollosa-Enterna; M Perez-Bacete; A Martinez-Lorente; A Llombart-Bosch Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 1998 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Jiazhong Jiang; Blake Lee Neubauer; Jeremy R Graff; Marcio Chedid; James E Thomas; Neal W Roehm; Shaobo Zhang; George J Eckert; Michael O Koch; John N Eble; Liang Cheng Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Liang Cheng; Chong-Xian Pan; Jian-Ting Zhang; Shaobo Zhang; Michael S Kinch; Lang Li; Lee Ann Baldridge; Christopher Wade; Zhiqiang Hu; Michael O Koch; Thomas M Ulbright; John N Eble Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-05-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sushil K Tripathi; Pardeep Kumar; Edouard J Trabulsi; Sung Kim; Peter A McCue; Charles Intenzo; Adam Berger; Leonard Gomella; Mathew L Thakur Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Shanna J Smith; Long Gu; Elizabeth A Phipps; Lacey E Dobrolecki; Karla S Mabrey; Pattie Gulley; Kelsey L Dillehay; Zhongyun Dong; Gregg B Fields; Yun-Ru Chen; David Ann; Robert J Hickey; Linda H Malkas Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Long Gu; Robert Lingeman; Fumiko Yakushijin; Emily Sun; Qi Cui; Jianfei Chao; Weidong Hu; Hongzhi Li; Robert J Hickey; Jeremy M Stark; Yate-Ching Yuan; Yuan Chen; Steven L Vonderfecht; Timothy W Synold; Yanhong Shi; Karen L Reckamp; David Horne; Linda H Malkas Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Caroline M Li; Pouya Haratipour; Robert G Lingeman; J Jefferson P Perry; Long Gu; Robert J Hickey; Linda H Malkas Journal: Cells Date: 2021-10-27 Impact factor: 6.600