Literature DB >> 21030024

Ultrasound echo is related to stress and strain in tendon.

Sarah Duenwald1, Hirohito Kobayashi, Kayt Frisch, Roderic Lakes, Ray Vanderby.   

Abstract

The mechanical behavior of tendons has been well studied in vitro. A noninvasive method to acquire mechanical data would be highly beneficial. Elastography has been a promising method of gathering in vivo tissue mechanical behavior, but it has inherent limitations. This study presents acoustoelasticity as an alternative ultrasound-based method of measuring tendon stress and strain by reporting a relationship between ultrasonic echo intensity (B-mode ultrasound image brightness) and mechanical behavior of tendon in vitro. Porcine digital flexor tendons were cyclically loaded in a mechanical testing system while an ultrasonic echo response was recorded. We report that echo intensity closely follows the applied cyclic strain pattern in time with higher strain protocols resulting in larger echo intensity changes. We also report that echo intensity is related nonlinearly to stress and nearly linearly to strain. This indicates that ultrasonic echo intensity is related to the mechanical behavior in a loaded tissue by an acoustoelastic response, as previously described in homogeneous, nearly incompressible materials. Acoustoelasticity is therefore able to relate strain-dependent stiffness and stress to the reflected echo, even in the processed B-mode signals reflected from viscoelastic and inhomogeneous material such as tendon, and is a promising metric to acquire in vivo mechanical data noninvasively.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21030024      PMCID: PMC3022962          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of an iterative reconstruction method for quantitative elastography.

Authors:  M M Doyley; P M Meaney; J C Bamber
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Acoustoelastic analysis of reflected waves in nearly incompressible, hyper-elastic materials: forward and inverse problems.

Authors:  Hirohito Kobayashi; Ray Vanderby
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; I Céspedes; H Ponnekanti; Y Yazdi; X Li
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  Fundamental limitations on the contrast-transfer efficiency in elastography: an analytic study.

Authors:  F Kallel; M Bertrand; J Ophir
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Kinetics and kinematics of the equine hind limb: in vivo tendon loads and force plate measurements in ponies.

Authors:  D J Riemersma; H C Schamhardt; W Hartman; J L Lammertink
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples.

Authors:  Abbas Samani; Judit Zubovits; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Fundamental mechanical limitations on the visualization of elasticity contrast in elastography.

Authors:  H Ponnekanti; J Ophir; Y Huang; I Céspedes
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  The spring in the arch of the human foot.

Authors:  R F Ker; M B Bennett; S R Bibby; R C Kester; R M Alexander
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jan 8-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions.

Authors:  Hui Zhi; Bing Ou; Bao-Ming Luo; Xia Feng; Yan-Ling Wen; Hai-Yun Yang
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Real-time sonoelastography of lateral epicondylitis: comparison of findings between patients and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Tobias De Zordo; Stephanie R Lill; Christian Fink; Gudrun M Feuchtner; Werner Jaschke; Rosa Bellmann-Weiler; Andrea S Klauser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  18 in total

1.  Noninvasive measurement of wave speed of porcine cornea in ex vivo porcine eyes for various intraocular pressures.

Authors:  Boran Zhou; Arthur J Sit; Xiaoming Zhang
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Temporal healing in rat achilles tendon: ultrasound correlations.

Authors:  Connie S Chamberlain; Sarah E Duenwald-Kuehl; Gregory Okotie; Sabrina H Brounts; Geoffrey S Baer; Ray Vanderby
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Strain-induced damage reduces echo intensity changes in tendon during loading.

Authors:  Sarah Duenwald-Kuehl; Roderic Lakes; Ray Vanderby
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Influence of tendon tears on ultrasound echo intensity in response to loading.

Authors:  Kayt E Frisch; David Marcu; Geoffrey S Baer; Darryl G Thelen; Ray Vanderby
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Time-dependent ultrasound echo changes occur in tendon during viscoelastic testing.

Authors:  Sarah Duenwald-Kuehl; Hirohito Kobayashi; Roderic Lakes; Ray Vanderby
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Ultrasound assessment of ex vivo lung tissue properties using a fluid-filled negative pressure bath.

Authors:  Sarah Duenwald-Kuehl; Melissa L Bates; Sonia Y Cortes; Marlowe W Eldridge; Ray Vanderby
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Ultrasound strain mapping of Achilles tendon compressive strain patterns during dorsiflexion.

Authors:  Ruth L Chimenti; A Samuel Flemister; John Ketz; Mary Bucklin; Mark R Buckley; Michael S Richards
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Is echogenicity a viable metric for evaluating tendon properties in vivo?

Authors:  Stephen M Suydam; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Feasibility and repeatability for in vivo measurements of stiffness gradients in the canine gastrocnemius tendon using an acoustoelastic strain gauge.

Authors:  Michelle Ellison; Hirohito Kobayashi; Fern Delaney; Kelson Danielson; Ray Vanderby; Peter Muir; Lisa J Forrest
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 1.363

10.  Biplanar High-Speed Fluoroscopy of Pony Superficial Digital Flexor Tendon (SDFT)-An In Vivo Pilot Study.

Authors:  Franziska C Wagner; Kerstin Gerlach; Sandra M Geiger; Claudia Gittel; Peter Böttcher; Christoph K W Mülling
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.