Literature DB >> 21030005

Differential dynamics of spatial and non-spatial stimulus-response compatibility effects: a dual task LRP study.

Carola Lehle1, Asher Cohen, Jörg Sangals, Werner Sommer, Birgit Stürmer.   

Abstract

Choice reaction times are shorter when stimulus and response features are compatible rather than incompatible. Recent studies revealed that spatial compatibility effects in Simon tasks are strongly attenuated when there is temporal overlap with a different high-priority task. In contrast, non-spatial variants of the Simon task appear to be unaffected by task overlap. The present study used the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) within a dual task design to elucidate the dynamics underlying these differential effects for a color and a spatial variant of the Simon task. In the color version there was no sign of early response priming by irrelevant stimulus features in the LRP. The color compatibility effect was independent of task overlap and reflected in the LRP onset latency. In contrast, in the spatial version, priming by irrelevant stimulus location showed up and was mirrored by early LRP activation. Response priming and the corresponding Simon effect, however, were present only in case of little temporal overlap with the primary task. The absence of spatial compatibility effects at strong temporal overlap suggests that response conflicts due to stimulus-related priming depend on the availability of processing resources. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21030005     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  3 in total

Review 1.  Filling the gaps: Cognitive control as a critical lens for understanding mechanisms of value-based decision-making.

Authors:  R Frömer; A Shenhav
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Effects of aging and involuntary capture of attention on event-related potentials associated with the processing of and the response to a target stimulus.

Authors:  Susana Cid-Fernández; Mónica Lindín; Fernando Díaz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Reference valence effects of affective s-R compatibility: are visual and auditory results consistent?

Authors:  Zhao Xiaojun; You Xuqun; Shi Changxiu; Gan Shuoqiu; Hu Chaoyi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.