Literature DB >> 21029977

Quantification of bone density of the proximal femur after hip resurfacing arthroplasty--comparison of different DXA acquisition modes.

Mikko A Hakulinen1, Håkan Borg, Arja Häkkinen, Tapani Parviainen, Ilkka Kiviranta, Jukka S Jurvelin.   

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a traditional operative procedure in the treatment of osteoarthritis. The hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) provides an alternative to the THA for young active patients. HRA is a bone-preserving procedure eliminating the problem of proximal femoral stress shielding and osteolysis associated to THA. Unfortunately, there is no standardized methodology to monitor the quality of bone after HRA. In this study, areal bone mineral density (BMD) in the operated hip (10 regions of interests [ROIs] of 34 volunteered HRA patients) was measured using Lunar Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and the agreement of a standard (dual femur) and an orthopedic (orthopedic hip) acquisition modes was compared. Furthermore, reproducibility of the patient-specific analysis procedures was tested. The analysis procedures were reproducible with both acquisition modes (1.18%-1.37%). The mean (± standard deviation) difference between the acquisition modes was 1.46 ± 0.93%. At ROIs, a strong linear relationship was found between the results from 2 acquisition modes (R(2)=0.801-0.966, p<0.01). In conclusion, both acquisition modes were reproducible, and it is suggested that the error induced by the different acquisition modes does not affect interpretation of BMD changes after HRA surgery.
Copyright © 2010 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21029977     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  2 in total

1.  Bone mineral density of the proximal femur after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: 1-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Arja Häkkinen; Håkan Borg; Mikko Hakulinen; Jukka Jurvelin; Esa Anttila; Tapani Parviainen; Ilkka Kiviranta
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Minimizing Stress Shielding and Cement Damage in Cemented Femoral Component of a Hip Prosthesis through Computational Design Optimization.

Authors:  Abdellah Ait Moussa; Justin Fischer; Rohan Yadav; Morshed Khandaker
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2017-02-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.