Literature DB >> 21029848

Complex system approaches to genetic analysis Bayesian approaches.

Melanie A Wilson1, James W Baurley, Duncan C Thomas, David V Conti.   

Abstract

Genetic epidemiology is increasingly focused on complex diseases involving multiple genes and environmental factors, often interacting in complex ways. Although standard frequentist methods still have a role in hypothesis generation and testing for discovery of novel main effects and interactions, Bayesian methods are particularly well suited to modeling the relationships in an integrated "systems biology" manner. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the principles of Bayesian analysis and their advantages in this context and describe various approaches to applying them for both model building and discovery in a genome-wide setting. In particular, we highlight the ability of Bayesian methods to construct complex probability models via a hierarchical structure and to account for uncertainty in model specification by averaging over large spaces of alternative models.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21029848      PMCID: PMC4190044          DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-380862-2.00003-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Genet        ISSN: 0065-2660            Impact factor:   1.944


  44 in total

1.  Empirical Bayes methods for testing associations with large numbers of candidate genes in the presence of environmental risk factors, with applications to HLA associations in IDDM.

Authors:  D Thomas; B Langholz; D Clayton; J Pitkäniemi; E Tuomilehto-Wolf; J Tuomilehto
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  Using hierarchical modeling in genetic association studies with multiple markers: application to a case-control study of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Rayjean J Hung; Paul Brennan; Christian Malaveille; Stefano Porru; Francesco Donato; Paolo Boffetta; John S Witte
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Genetic dissection and prognostic modeling of overt stroke in sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Paola Sebastiani; Marco F Ramoni; Vikki Nolan; Clinton T Baldwin; Martin H Steinberg
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  A Bayesian measure of the probability of false discovery in genetic epidemiology studies.

Authors:  Jon Wakefield
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Symbolic modeling of epistasis.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Nate Barney; Chia-Ti Tsai; Fu-Tien Chiang; Jiang Gui; Bill C White
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 6.  Empirical-Bayes and semi-Bayes approaches to occupational and environmental hazard surveillance.

Authors:  S Greenland; C Poole
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb

Review 7.  Use of pathway information in molecular epidemiology.

Authors:  Duncan C Thomas; David V Conti; James Baurley; Frederik Nijhout; Michael Reed; Cornelia M Ulrich
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.639

Review 8.  Epistasis and its implications for personal genetics.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  A consistent approach for the application of pharmacokinetic modeling in cancer and noncancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Harvey J Clewell; Melvin E Andersen; Hugh A Barton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Epistatic module detection for case-control studies: a Bayesian model with a Gibbs sampling strategy.

Authors:  Wanwan Tang; Xuebing Wu; Rui Jiang; Yanda Li
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  2 in total

1.  Incorporating prior biologic information for high-dimensional rare variant association studies.

Authors:  Melanie A Quintana; Fredrick R Schumacher; Graham Casey; Jonine L Bernstein; Li Li; David V Conti
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Joint analysis for integrating two related studies of different data types and different study designs using hierarchical modeling approaches.

Authors:  Rui Li; David V Conti; David Diaz-Sanchez; Frank Gilliland; Duncan C Thomas
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 0.444

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.