Literature DB >> 21029823

Relation between obesity and the attainment of optimal blood pressure and lipid targets in high vascular risk outpatients.

Vineet Bhan1, Raymond T Yan, Lawrence A Leiter, David H Fitchett, Anatoly Langer, Eva Lonn, Mary Tan, Stewart Silagy, Shaun G Goodman, Andrew T Yan.   

Abstract

Obesity is associated with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes, but it is also an independent cardiovascular risk factor. We sought to evaluate the differences in treatment patterns and attainment of guideline-recommended targets among high-risk vascular outpatients in relation to their body mass index (BMI). The prospective Vascular Protection and Guideline Orientated Approach to Lipid Lowering Registries recruited 7,357 high-risk vascular outpatients in Canada from 2001 to 2004. We stratified the patient population into 3 groups according to their BMI: normal weight (BMI <24.9 kg/m²), overweight (BMI 25 to 29.9 kg/m²), and obese (BMI >30 kg/m²). We evaluated the rates of attainment for contemporary guideline targets of blood pressure (<140/90 or <130/80 mm Hg in the presence of diabetes) and lipids (low-density lipoprotein [LDL] <2.5 mmol/L [96.7 mg/dl] and total cholesterol [TC]/high-density lipoprotein [HDL] ratio <4.0). Of the 7,357 patients, 1,305 (17.7%) were normal weight, 2,791 (37.9%) overweight, and 3,261 (44.4%) obese, as determined by the BMI. Obese patients were younger and more likely to have hypertension and diabetes (all p <0.001 for trend). Obese patients had higher baseline blood pressure, TC, LDL cholesterol, triglyceride levels and TC/HDL ratio, and lower HDL cholesterol. Obese patients were more likely to be treated with antihypertensive agents (p = 0.002), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (p = 0.024), angiotensin receptor blockers (p <0.001), and high-dose statin therapy (p = 0.001). On multivariable analyses, obese patients were less likely to attain the blood pressure (odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.90, p = 0.001) and TC/HDL ratio (odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.55, p <0.001) targets but not the LDL targets (odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.03, p = 0.11). In conclusion, only a minority ambulatory patients at high cardiovascular risk achieved both guideline-recommended blood pressure and lipid targets, and this significant treatment gap was more pronounced among obese patients. Our findings underscore the opportunity to optimize the treatment of these high-risk patients.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21029823     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

1.  Antihypertensive treatment in patients with class 3 obesity.

Authors:  Jens Jordan; Sam W Boye; Stephanie Le Breton; Deborah L Keefe; Stefan Engeli; Margaret Forney Prescott
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 2.  Non-interventional management of resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Michael Doumas; Costas Tsioufis; Charles Faselis; Antonios Lazaridis; Haris Grassos; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-26

Review 3.  Left ventricular hypertrophy and obesity: only a matter of fat?

Authors:  Giuseppe Murdolo; Fabio Angeli; Gianpaolo Reboldi; Letizia Di Giacomo; Adolfo Aita; Claudia Bartolini; Paolo Vedecchia
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2014-08-13

4.  Prevalence of undiagnosed and inadequately treated type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in morbidly obese patients who present for bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Rouzbeh Mostaedi; Denise E Lackey; Sean H Adams; Stephen A Dada; Zahid A Hoda; Mohamed R Ali
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Lack of reduction of left ventricular mass in treated hypertension: the strong heart study.

Authors:  Giovanni de Simone; Richard B Devereux; Raffaele Izzo; Daniela Girfoglio; Elisa T Lee; Barbara V Howard; Mary J Roman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Impact of Obesity on the Metabolic Control of Type 2 Diabetes: Results of the Turkish Nationwide Survey of Glycemic and Other Metabolic Parameters of Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (TEMD Obesity Study).

Authors:  Alper Sonmez; Volkan Yumuk; Cem Haymana; Ibrahim Demirci; Cem Barcin; Sinem Kıyıcı; Sibel Güldiken; Gonca Örük; Basak Ozgen Saydam; Süleyman Baldane; Faruk Kutlutürk; Ferit Kerim Küçükler; Oğuzhan Deyneli; Berrin Çetinarslan; Tevfik Sabuncu; Fahri Bayram; Ilhan Satman
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.807

7.  Effect of eprosartan-based antihypertensive therapy on coronary heart disease risk assessed by Framingham methodology in Canadian patients with diabetes: results of the POWER survey.

Authors:  Robert J Petrella; Dawn P Gill; Jean-Pascal Berrou
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.168

8.  Olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in obese participants with hypertension: a TRINITY subanalysis.

Authors:  Eli M Roth; Suzanne Oparil; Michael Melino; James Lee; Victor Fernandez; Reinilde Heyrman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Contemporary management and attainment of cholesterol targets for patients with dyslipidemia in China.

Authors:  Fei Gao; Yu Jie Zhou; Da Yi Hu; Ying Xin Zhao; Yu Yang Liu; Zhi Jian Wang; Shi Wei Yang; Xiao Li Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Association between polymorphisms of alpha-adducin gene and essential hypertension in Chinese population.

Authors:  Li-na Zhang; Lin-dan Ji; Li-juan Fei; Fang Yuan; Yue-miao Zhang; Jin Xu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.