| Literature DB >> 21029786 |
Natuo Kômoto1, Kenji Yukuhiro, Kyoichiro Ueda, Shuichiro Tomita.
Abstract
Phasmids are remarkable mimics of twigs, sticks, and leaves. This extreme adaptation for crypsis can easily lead to the convergent evolution of morphology, making it difficult to establish a taxonomic system of phasmids. Accordingly, there are multiple phylogenetic hypotheses that conflict with each other. Phylogenetic arrangements suggested by molecular data disagree with the morphology-based taxonomy in some instances. We collected 13 phasmatodean species, sequenced their mitochondrial genomes, and recovered their molecular phylogeny. Our analyses did not support the monophyly of Areolatae or Anareolatae, two major infraorders of Phasmatodea. The position of Neohirasea was also quite different from the conventional taxonomic systems, thus challenging the previously assumed monophyly of the subfamily Lonchodinae. The enigmatic taxon, Timema, was shown to be distantly related to other phasmatodeans.Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21029786 DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.10.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Phylogenet Evol ISSN: 1055-7903 Impact factor: 4.286