Literature DB >> 21029419

MOLA: a bootable, self-configuring system for virtual screening using AutoDock4/Vina on computer clusters.

Rui Mv Abreu1, Hugo Jc Froufe, Maria João Rp Queiroz, Isabel Cfr Ferreira.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Virtual screening of small molecules using molecular docking has become an important tool in drug discovery. However, large scale virtual screening is time demanding and usually requires dedicated computer clusters. There are a number of software tools that perform virtual screening using AutoDock4 but they require access to dedicated Linux computer clusters. Also no software is available for performing virtual screening with Vina using computer clusters. In this paper we present MOLA, an easy-to-use graphical user interface tool that automates parallel virtual screening using AutoDock4 and/or Vina in bootable non-dedicated computer clusters. IMPLEMENTATION: MOLA automates several tasks including: ligand preparation, parallel AutoDock4/Vina jobs distribution and result analysis. When the virtual screening project finishes, an open-office spreadsheet file opens with the ligands ranked by binding energy and distance to the active site. All results files can automatically be recorded on an USB-flash drive or on the hard-disk drive using VirtualBox. MOLA works inside a customized Live CD GNU/Linux operating system, developed by us, that bypass the original operating system installed on the computers used in the cluster. This operating system boots from a CD on the master node and then clusters other computers as slave nodes via ethernet connections.
CONCLUSION: MOLA is an ideal virtual screening tool for non-experienced users, with a limited number of multi-platform heterogeneous computers available and no access to dedicated Linux computer clusters. When a virtual screening project finishes, the computers can just be restarted to their original operating system. The originality of MOLA lies on the fact that, any platform-independent computer available can he added to the cluster, without ever using the computer hard-disk drive and without interfering with the installed operating system. With a cluster of 10 processors, and a potential maximum speed-up of 10x, the parallel algorithm of MOLA performed with a speed-up of 8,64× using AutoDock4 and 8,60× using Vina.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21029419      PMCID: PMC2987878          DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-2-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cheminform        ISSN: 1758-2946            Impact factor:   5.514


  10 in total

Review 1.  Structure-based virtual screening of chemical libraries for drug discovery.

Authors:  Sutapa Ghosh; Aihua Nie; Jing An; Ziwei Huang
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 2.  Protein-ligand docking: current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Sérgio Filipe Sousa; Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes; Maria João Ramos
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-10-01

3.  BDT: an easy-to-use front-end application for automation of massive docking tasks and complex docking strategies with AutoDock.

Authors:  Montserrat Vaqué; Anna Arola; Carles Aliagas; Gerard Pujadas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Virtual screening of human 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide transformylase against the NCI diversity set by use of AutoDock to identify novel nonfolate inhibitors.

Authors:  Chenglong Li; Lan Xu; Dennis W Wolan; Ian A Wilson; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Molecular-docking-guided design, synthesis, and biologic evaluation of radioiodinated quinazolinone prodrugs.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Ayman F Al Aowad; S James Adelstein; Amin I Kassis
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.

Authors:  Oleg Trott; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Ligand docking and binding site analysis with PyMOL and Autodock/Vina.

Authors:  Daniel Seeliger; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  DOVIS: an implementation for high-throughput virtual screening using AutoDock.

Authors:  Shuxing Zhang; Kamal Kumar; Xiaohui Jiang; Anders Wallqvist; Jaques Reifman
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  DOVIS 2.0: an efficient and easy to use parallel virtual screening tool based on AutoDock 4.0.

Authors:  Xiaohui Jiang; Kamal Kumar; Xin Hu; Anders Wallqvist; Jaques Reifman
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 4.215

  10 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Open source molecular modeling.

Authors:  Somayeh Pirhadi; Jocelyn Sunseri; David Ryan Koes
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.518

2.  Accessible high-throughput virtual screening molecular docking software for students and educators.

Authors:  Reed B Jacob; Tim Andersen; Owen M McDougal
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  wFReDoW: a cloud-based web environment to handle molecular docking simulations of a fully flexible receptor model.

Authors:  Renata De Paris; Fábio A Frantz; Osmar Norberto de Souza; Duncan D A Ruiz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  1-aryl-3-[4-(thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-4-yloxy)phenyl]ureas as VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors: synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modelling studies.

Authors:  Pedro Soares; Raquel Costa; Hugo J C Froufe; Ricardo C Calhelha; Daniela Peixoto; Isabel C F R Ferreira; Rui M V Abreu; Raquel Soares; Maria-João R P Queiroz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  istar: a web platform for large-scale protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  Hongjian Li; Kwong-Sak Leung; Pedro J Ballester; Man-Hon Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  AMDock: a versatile graphical tool for assisting molecular docking with Autodock Vina and Autodock4.

Authors:  Mario S Valdés-Tresanco; Mario E Valdés-Tresanco; Pedro A Valiente; Ernesto Moreno
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.540

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.