Literature DB >> 2101108

Risk factors in amblyopia.

J Sjöstrand1, M Abrahamsson.   

Abstract

Any intervention to prevent serious amblyopia is based on the knowledge about normal versus subnormal visual development. Our ability to predict with high degree of certainty which children will develop amblyopia will be dependent on the characteristics of various risk factors for initiating the development of squint or amblyopia. We have used longitudinal studies of population based cohorts of young children to define some of these risk factors such as refractive errors. Three hundred and ten children with an astigmatism greater than or equal to 1.0 D at one year of age were refracted yearly between the age one and four years. Astigmatism and anisometropia were found to be highly variable during infancy and early childhood. Longitudinal follow-up seems to be needed to separate the normal from the abnormal refraction development, which initiates the development of the amblyopia. Children with constant or increasing astigmatism or anisometropia between one and four years were 'at risk'. In parallel we have studied important factors for successful treatment of amblyopia. Based on these findings we conclude that a population screening at four years of age seems to be advantageous in Sweden in order detect and successfully treat most cases of amblyopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2101108     DOI: 10.1038/eye.1990.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  16 in total

1.  The association between anisometropia, amblyopia, and binocularity in the absence of strabismus.

Authors:  D R Weakley
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

2.  Prevalence and associations of anisometropia and aniso-astigmatism in a population based sample of 6 year old children.

Authors:  S C Huynh; X Y Wang; J Ip; D Robaei; A Kifley; K A Rose; P Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Measurement of the validity of a preschool vision screening program.

Authors:  B Robinson; W R Bobier; E Martin; L Bryant
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Utilizing minicomputer technology for low-cost photorefraction: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Rajat Agarwala; Alexander Leube; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Screening for refractive errors in children: accuracy of the hand held refractor Retinomax to screen for astigmatism.

Authors:  M Cordonnier; M Dramaix
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Natural history of amblyopia untreated owing to lack of compliance.

Authors:  K Simons; M Preslan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Refractive error among urban preschool children in Xuzhou, China.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Wang; Dan Liu; Ruifang Feng; Huashuo Zhao; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Factors influencing the prevalence of amblyopia in children with anisometropia.

Authors:  Chong Eun Lee; Young Chun Lee; Se-Youp Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-03

9.  Visual outcomes and amblyogenic risk factors in craniosynostotic syndromes: a review of 141 cases.

Authors:  S H Khan; K K Nischal; F Dean; R D Hayward; J Walker
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Stereopsis and fusion in anisometropia according to the presence of amblyopia.

Authors:  Hyun Sun Jeon; Dong Gyu Choi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.