Literature DB >> 20981606

Agrochemical spray drift; assessment and mitigation--a review.

Allan S Felsot1, John B Unsworth, Jan B H J Linders, Graham Roberts, Dirk Rautman, Caroline Harris, Elizabeth Carazo.   

Abstract

During application of agrochemicals spray droplets can drift beyond the intended target to non-target receptors, including water, plants and animals. Factors affecting this spray drift include mode of application, droplet size, which can be modified by the nozzle types, formulation adjuvants, wind direction, wind speed, air stability, relative humidity, temperature and height of released spray relative to the crop canopy. The rate of fall of spray droplets depends upon the size of the droplets but is modified by entrainment in a mobile air mass and is also influenced by the rate of evaporation of the liquid constituting the aerosol. The longer the aerosol remains in the air before falling to the ground (or alternatively striking an object above ground) the greater the opportunity for it to be carried away from its intended target. In general, all size classes of droplets are capable of movement off target, but the smallest are likely to move the farthest before depositing on the ground or a non-target receptor. It is not possible to avoid spray drift completely but it can be minimized by using best-management practices. These include using appropriate nozzle types, shields, spray pressure, volumes per area sprayed, tractor speed and only spraying when climatic conditions are suitable. Field layout can also influence spray drift, whilst crop-free and spray-free buffer zones and windbreak crops can also have a mitigating effect. Various models are available to estimate the environmental exposure from spray drift at the time of application.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20981606     DOI: 10.1080/03601234.2010.515161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci Health B        ISSN: 0360-1234            Impact factor:   1.990


  13 in total

1.  Spray Drift from a Conventional Axial Fan Airblast Sprayer in a Modern Orchard Work Environment.

Authors:  Edward J Kasner; Richard A Fenske; Gwen A Hoheisel; Kit Galvin; Magali N Blanco; Edmund Y W Seto; Michael G Yost
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.179

2.  UAV spraying on citrus crop: impact of tank-mix adjuvant on the contact angle and droplet distribution.

Authors:  Yanhua Meng; Wanqiang Zhong; Cunjia Liu; Jinya Su; Jiyuan Su; Yubin Lan; Zhiguo Wang; Meimei Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  [Playful Learning: a tool for Environmental Education].

Authors:  Reichel Rodríguez-Miranda; Luis Palomo-Cordero; Michael Padilla-Mora; Andrea Corrales-Vargas; Berna van Wendel de Joode
Journal:  Rev Cienc Ambient       Date:  2022 Jan-Jun

4.  A field spray drift study to determine the downwind effects of isoxaflutole herbicide to nontarget plants.

Authors:  Dwayne R J Moore; Colleen D Priest; Ben H Brayden; John P Hanzas; Meghan R Arpino; Leif Richardson; Jody Stryker; Chris Banman; Sara I Rodney; Andrew Chapple; Tilghman Hall; Rena Isemer; Lisa Ortego; Ismael Rodea-Palomares; Jane Tang; Mengyuan Wang; Tianbo Xu; Yaning Yang
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  How does exposure to pesticides vary in space and time for residents living near to treated orchards?

Authors:  Hie Ling Wong; David G Garthwaite; Carmel T Ramwell; Colin D Brown
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Real-time particle monitoring of pesticide drift from an axial fan airblast orchard sprayer.

Authors:  Magali N Blanco; Richard A Fenske; Edward J Kasner; Michael G Yost; Edmund Seto; Elena Austin
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  Measurement of Spray Drift with a Specifically Designed Lidar System.

Authors:  Eduard Gregorio; Xavier Torrent; Santiago Planas de Martí; Francesc Solanelles; Ricardo Sanz; Francesc Rocadenbosch; Joan Masip; Manel Ribes-Dasi; Joan R Rosell-Polo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Pesticide exposure assessed through agricultural crop proximity and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Marco Vinceti; Tommaso Filippini; Federica Violi; Kenneth J Rothman; Sofia Costanzini; Carlotta Malagoli; Lauren A Wise; Anna Odone; Carlo Signorelli; Laura Iacuzio; Elisa Arcolin; Jessica Mandrioli; Nicola Fini; Francesco Patti; Salvatore Lo Fermo; Vladimiro Pietrini; Sergio Teggi; Grazia Ghermandi; Renato Scillieri; Caterina Ledda; Cristina Mauceri; Salvatore Sciacca; Maria Fiore; Margherita Ferrante
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Mixture toxicity assisting the design of eco-friendlier plant protection products: a case-study using a commercial herbicide combining nicosulfuron and terbuthylazine.

Authors:  Libânia Queirós; Tânia Vidal; António J A Nogueira; Fernando J M Gonçalves; Joana Luísa Pereira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Botanical Origin of Pesticide Residues in Pollen Loads Collected by Honeybees During and After Apple Bloom.

Authors:  Riccardo Favaro; Lisbeth Marie Bauer; Michele Rossi; Luca D'Ambrosio; Edith Bucher; Sergio Angeli
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.