PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the clinical effectiveness of snapshot inversion recovery (SNAPIR), which is a dedicated optimized inversion-recovery-prepared single-shot fast spin-echo T1-weighted sequence, in the delineation of normal fetal brain anatomy compared with that of the currently used T1-weighted gradient-echo protocol, which often yields images of poor quality due to motion artifacts and inadequate contrast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the hospital research ethics committee, and informed written consent was obtained from all patients. Forty-one fetuses were examined at 19-37 weeks gestation (mean, 29 weeks gestation) by using both the standard T1-weighted protocol and the optimized T1-weighted SNAPIR protocol with a 1.5-T imager. Two independent blinded observers performed qualitative analysis, evaluating overall diagnostic quality, detailed anatomic delineation, and severity of motion artifacts. Quantitative analysis comprised calculation of contrast ratios (CRs) for the cortical gray matter, subplate, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare image rating scores, the paired t test was used to compare CRs, and κ statistics were used to test interobserver agreement. RESULTS: Both overall diagnostic quality (P < .001) and detailed anatomic delineation (P < .001) were enhanced with SNAPIR compared with the standard T1-weighted acquisition. Also, motion artifacts were less severe (P = .008) and less extensive (P < .001) with SNAPIR. Corresponding CRs were increased with SNAPIR in seven of eight examined regions. CONCLUSION: SNAPIR is a promising robust alternative to the current T1-weighted acquisitions; its role in the detection of disease requires further study.
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the clinical effectiveness of snapshot inversion recovery (SNAPIR), which is a dedicated optimized inversion-recovery-prepared single-shot fast spin-echo T1-weighted sequence, in the delineation of normal fetal brain anatomy compared with that of the currently used T1-weighted gradient-echo protocol, which often yields images of poor quality due to motion artifacts and inadequate contrast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the hospital research ethics committee, and informed written consent was obtained from all patients. Forty-one fetuses were examined at 19-37 weeks gestation (mean, 29 weeks gestation) by using both the standard T1-weighted protocol and the optimized T1-weighted SNAPIR protocol with a 1.5-T imager. Two independent blinded observers performed qualitative analysis, evaluating overall diagnostic quality, detailed anatomic delineation, and severity of motion artifacts. Quantitative analysis comprised calculation of contrast ratios (CRs) for the cortical gray matter, subplate, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare image rating scores, the paired t test was used to compare CRs, and κ statistics were used to test interobserver agreement. RESULTS: Both overall diagnostic quality (P < .001) and detailed anatomic delineation (P < .001) were enhanced with SNAPIR compared with the standard T1-weighted acquisition. Also, motion artifacts were less severe (P = .008) and less extensive (P < .001) with SNAPIR. Corresponding CRs were increased with SNAPIR in seven of eight examined regions. CONCLUSION: SNAPIR is a promising robust alternative to the current T1-weighted acquisitions; its role in the detection of disease requires further study.
Authors: C Malamateniou; S J Malik; S J Counsell; J M Allsop; A K McGuinness; T Hayat; K Broadhouse; R G Nunes; A M Ederies; J V Hajnal; M A Rutherford Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ali Gholipour; Judith A Estroff; Carol E Barnewolt; Richard L Robertson; P Ellen Grant; Borjan Gagoski; Simon K Warfield; Onur Afacan; Susan A Connolly; Jeffrey J Neil; Adam Wolfberg; Robert V Mulkern Journal: Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 0.481
Authors: Deniz Vatansever; Vanessa Kyriakopoulou; Joanna M Allsop; Matthew Fox; Andrew Chew; Joseph V Hajnal; Mary A Rutherford Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.847
Authors: Antonio de Marvao; Timothy J W Dawes; Wenzhe Shi; Christopher Minas; Niall G Keenan; Tamara Diamond; Giuliana Durighel; Giovanni Montana; Daniel Rueckert; Stuart A Cook; Declan P O'Regan Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Giulio Ferrazzi; Anthony N Price; Rui Pedro A G Teixeira; Lucilio Cordero-Grande; Jana Hutter; Ana Gomes; Francesco Padormo; Emer Hughes; Torben Schneider; Mary Rutherford; Maria Kuklisova Murgasova; Joseph V Hajnal Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: B J van der Knoop; I A Zonnenberg; J I M L Verbeke; L S de Vries; L R Pistorius; M M van Weissenbruch; R J Vermeulen; J I P de Vries Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 7.299