Literature DB >> 20980367

Mutagenicity of 11 cigarette smoke condensates in two versions of the mouse lymphoma assay.

Xiaoqing Guo1, Tracie L Verkler, Ying Chen, Patricia A Richter, Gregory M Polzin, Martha M Moore, Nan Mei.   

Abstract

Cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) is genotoxic in nearly all assays in which it has been tested. In this study, we investigated the mutagenicity of 11 CSCs using the microwell and soft-agar versions of the mouse lymphoma assay (MLA). These CSCs were prepared from commercial or experimental cigarettes, 10 of them were produced using International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) conditions and one CSC was generated using intense Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) conditions. In the presence of rat liver S9, the L5178Y/Tk(+/-) mouse lymphoma cells were treated with 11 CSCs at different concentrations (25-200 μg/ml) for 4 h. All CSCs resulted in dose-dependent increases of both cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in both versions of the MLA. The mutagenic potencies of the CSCs were calculated as mutant frequency per microgram CSC from the slope of the linear regression of the dose-response curves and showed no correlations with the tar yield of the cigarette or nicotine concentrations of the CSCs. Comparing two CSCs produced from the same commercial cigarettes using two different smoking conditions, the one generated under ISO conditions was more mutagenic than the other generated under intense conditions on a per microgram CSC basis. We also examined the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at four microsatellite loci spanning the entire chromosome 11 for the mutants induced by 11 CSCs. The most common type of mutation observed was LOH with chromosome damage spanning less than ∼34 Mbp. These results indicate that the MLA identifies different genotoxic potencies among a variety of CSCs and that the results from both versions of the assay are comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20980367      PMCID: PMC6359891          DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geq083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  12 in total

1.  Prevention of lung injury by Muc1 mucin in a mouse model of repetitive Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Umehara; Kosuke Kato; Yong Sung Park; Erik P Lillehoj; Hideyuki Kawauchi; Kwang Chul Kim
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 2.  Surviving With Smog and Smoke: Precision Interventions?

Authors:  Hua Cai; Chen Wang
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  In vitro investigation of the mutagenic potential of Aloe vera extracts.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Guo; Suhui Zhang; Stacey L Dial; Mary D Boudreau; Qingsu Xia; Peter P Fu; Dan D Levy; Martha M Moore; Nan Mei
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.524

4.  Quantitative differentiation of whole smoke solution-induced mutagenicity in the mouse lymphoma assay.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Guo; Robert H Heflich; Stacey L Dial; Mamata De; Patricia A Richter; Nan Mei
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Mechanistic evaluation of Ginkgo biloba leaf extract-induced genotoxicity in L5178Y cells.

Authors:  Haixia Lin; Xiaoqing Guo; Suhui Zhang; Stacey L Dial; Lei Guo; Mugimane G Manjanatha; Martha M Moore; Nan Mei
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Nitroxide TEMPO: a genotoxic and oxidative stress inducer in cultured cells.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Guo; Roberta A Mittelstaedt; Lei Guo; Joseph G Shaddock; Robert H Heflich; Anita H Bigger; Martha M Moore; Nan Mei
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Comparative potency analysis of whole smoke solutions in the bacterial reverse mutation test.

Authors:  Fanxue Meng; Nan Mei; Jian Yan; Xiaoqing Guo; Patricia A Richter; Tao Chen; Mamata De
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Genetic toxicology and toxicogenomic analysis of three cigarette smoke condensates in vitro reveals few differences among full-flavor, blonde, and light products.

Authors:  Carole L Yauk; Andrew Williams; Julie K Buick; Guosheng Chen; Rebecca M Maertens; Sabina Halappanavar; Paul A White
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Use of the zebrafish larvae as a model to study cigarette smoke condensate toxicity.

Authors:  Lee D Ellis; Evelyn C Soo; John C Achenbach; Michael G Morash; Kelly H Soanes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Genomic impact of cigarette smoke, with application to three smoking-related diseases.

Authors:  M Talikka; N Sierro; N V Ivanov; N Chaudhary; M J Peck; J Hoeng; C R E Coggins; M C Peitsch
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 5.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.