Literature DB >> 20980325

Sexual dimorphism in resource acquisition and deployment: both size and timing matter.

Julia Sánchez Vilas1, John R Pannell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The males and females of many dioecious plant species differ from one another in important life-history traits, such as their size. If male and female reproductive functions draw on different resources, for example, one should expect males and females to display different allocation strategies as they grow. Importantly, these strategies may differ not only between the two sexes, but also between plants of different age and therefore size. Results are presented from an experiment that asks whether males and females of Mercurialis annua, an annual plant with indeterminate growth, differ over time in their allocation of two potentially limiting resources (carbon and nitrogen) to vegetative (below- and above-ground) and reproductive tissues.
METHODS: Comparisons were made of the temporal patterns of biomass allocation to shoots, roots and reproduction and the nitrogen content in the leaves between the sexes of M. annua by harvesting plants of each sex after growth over different periods of time. KEY RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Males and females differed in their temporal patterns of allocation. Males allocated more to reproduction than females at early stages, but this trend was reversed at later stages. Importantly, males allocated proportionally more of their biomass towards roots at later stages, but the roots of females were larger in absolute terms. The study points to the important role played by both the timing of resource deployment and the relative versus absolute sizes of the sinks and sources in sexual dimorphism of an annual plant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20980325      PMCID: PMC3002469          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  2 in total

1.  Roots, shoots and reproduction: sexual dimorphism in size and costs of reproductive allocation in an annual herb.

Authors:  Mark S Harris; John R Pannell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Evolutionary consequences of gender plasticity in genetically dimorphic breeding systems.

Authors:  Lynda F Delph; Diana E Wolf
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.151

  2 in total
  11 in total

1.  The ecology of plant populations: their dynamics, interactions and evolution.

Authors:  John R Pannell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  A test of the size-constraint hypothesis for a limit to sexual dimorphism in plants.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Labouche; John R Pannell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  No evidence of sexual niche partitioning in a dioecious moss with rare sexual reproduction.

Authors:  Irene Bisang; Johan Ehrlén; Helena Korpelainen; Lars Hedenäs
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Soil water content and patterns of allocation to below- and above-ground biomass in the sexes of the subdioecious plant Honckenya peploides.

Authors:  Julia Sánchez-Vilas; Raimundo Bermúdez; Rubén Retuerto
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Sexual dimorphism and rapid turnover in gene expression in pre-reproductive seedlings of a dioecious herb.

Authors:  Guillaume G Cossard; Melissa A Toups; John R Pannell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Floral structure and development in the monoecious palm Gaussia attenuata (Arecaceae; Arecoideae).

Authors:  Felipe Castaño; Fred Stauffer; Xavier Marquinez; Michèle Crèvecoeur; Myriam Collin; Jean-Christophe Pintaud; James Tregear
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Sex-differential herbivory in androdioecious Mercurialis annua.

Authors:  Julia Sánchez Vilas; John R Pannell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Low siring success of females with an acquired male function illustrates the legacy of sexual dimorphism in constraining the breakdown of dioecy.

Authors:  Luis Santos Del Blanco; Eleri Tudor; John R Pannell
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Variation in sexual dimorphism in a wind-pollinated plant: the influence of geographical context and life-cycle dynamics.

Authors:  Gemma Puixeu; Melinda Pickup; David L Field; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Response of Mercurialis annua to Stress.

Authors:  Ezra M Orlofsky; Giorgi Kozhoridze; Lyudmila Lyubenova; Elena Ostrozhenkova; J Barbro Winkler; Peter Schröder; Adelbert Bacher; Wolfgang Eisenreich; Micha Guy; Avi Golan-Goldhirsh
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2016-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.