Literature DB >> 20980070

Field trial of a synthetic tsetse-repellent technology developed for the control of bovine trypanosomosis in Kenya.

B Bett1, T F Randolph, P Irungu, S O Nyamwaro, P Kitala, J Gathuma, D Grace, G Vale, J Hargrove, J McDermott.   

Abstract

We conducted a field trial among Maasai cattle-keepers in Nkuruman and Nkineji areas of Kenya to evaluate the effectiveness of a synthetic tsetse-repellent technology developed for the control of trypanosomosis in cattle. The technology was a repellent (2-methoxy 4-methylphenol) emitted from dispensers attached to collars worn by cattle. Treatment was allocated at the herd level to ensure adequate protection of all the animals in a herd, with measurements of effectiveness conducted at the individual-animal level. The trial began in April 2005 and ran for 16 months including a baseline phase of 4 months. We recruited 12 herds in each area using a restricted random-sampling technique and distributed them equally into intervention (repellent) and control groups. Sample size was determined using a formal power calculation. Effectiveness or minimal worthwhile difference was defined as a 50% reduction in the incidence of trypanosome infection in the treated versus control group (effectiveness below which the technology was considered by experts as not viable compared to existing control techniques). All the animals in the recruited herds were screened monthly (buffy-coat technique) for trypanosome infections. The analysis followed the principle of intention-to-treat by which subjects are analysed according to their initial treatment assignment, regardless of the mechanical performance of the device. Crude and adjusted effects of the technology were 23% (p<0.001) and 18% (p=0.08) reduction in the infection incidence in the treatment compared to the control groups, respectively. The impact of the technology estimated in this study did not achieve the threshold of 50% reduction in the trypanosome infection incidence set a priori to indicate effectiveness (p<0.001). We therefore concluded that the prototype repellent technology package was not sufficiently effective in reducing trypanosome infection incidence under natural tsetse challenge to merit commercial development.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20980070     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  5 in total

1.  Productivity in different cattle production systems in Kenya.

Authors:  Joshua Orungo Onono; Barbara Wieland; Jonathan Rushton
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Negative regulation of root-knot nematode parasitic behavior by root-derived volatiles of wild relatives of Cucumis metuliferus CM3.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Xie; Jian Ling; Zhenchuan Mao; Yan Li; Jianlong Zhao; Yuhong Yang; Yanlin Li; Mingyue Liu; Xingfang Gu; Bingyan Xie
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 7.291

3.  Protecting cows in small holder farms in East Africa from tsetse flies by mimicking the odor profile of a non-host bovid.

Authors:  Rajinder K Saini; Benedict O Orindi; Norber Mbahin; John A Andoke; Peter N Muasa; David M Mbuvi; Caroline M Muya; John A Pickett; Christian W Borgemeister
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-10-17

4.  The potential economic benefits of controlling trypanosomiasis using waterbuck repellent blend in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Zewdu Abro; Menale Kassie; Beatrice Muriithi; Michael Okal; Daniel Masiga; Gift Wanda; Ouedraogo Gisèle; Abah Samuel; Etienne Nguertoum; Rock Aimé Nina; Philémon Mansinsa; Yahaya Adam; Mamadou Camara; Pamela Olet; Diarra Boucader; Susana Jamal; Abdoul Razak Issa Garba; Joseph Joachim Ajakaiye; Jean Felix Kinani; Mohamed Adam Hassan; Hezron Nonga; Joyce Daffa; Ambrose Gidudu; Kalinga Chilongo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Push by a net, pull by a cow: can zooprophylaxis enhance the impact of insecticide treated bed nets on malaria control?

Authors:  Hanako Iwashita; Gabriel O Dida; George O Sonye; Toshihiko Sunahara; Kyoko Futami; Sammy M Njenga; Luis F Chaves; Noboru Minakawa
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.876

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.