Literature DB >> 20979874

[A comparative study of anterior versus conventional approach right hepatectomy for large hepatocellular carcinoma].

Shao-qiang Li1, Li-jian Liang, Bao-gang Peng, Xiao-yu Yin, Ming-de Lü, Ming Kuang, Dong-ming Li, Shun-jun Fu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes between anterior versus conventional approach right hepatectomy for large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS: A total of 188 consecutive patients with large HCC ( > or =5 cm) undergoing right hepatectomy were reviewed retrospectively. Among them, 92 patients received anterior approach right hepatectomy (anterior group) while the other conventional right hepatectomy (conventional group). Their clinicopathologic data and survivals were compared.
RESULTS: There were five surgical deaths (2.7%), two in the anterior group and three in the conventional group. The biochemical and tumor pathological data (except for tumor size) of these two groups were comparable. The mean intraoperative blood loss, the number of patients with massive hemorrhage ( >3000 ml) and the volume of blood transfusion of the anterior group were markedly less than those of conventional group. The 1-, 3-year disease-free survival rates of the anterior group were significantly better than those of the conventional group (56.2%, 30.9% vs. 39.1%, 13.0%, P = 0.043). The 1- & 3-year cumulative survival rates of the anterior group were also markedly higher than those of conventional group. The Cox regression model indicated that tumor size [P = 0.014, odd ratio (OD) = 1.074] and surgical procedure (P = 0.009, OD = 0. 468) were independent risk factors correlated with disease-free survival. And the surgical procedure (P = 0.003, OD = 0.369) was the only independent risk factor for postoperative cumulative survival.
CONCLUSION: Anterior approach right hepatectomy can significantly decrease intraoperative blood loss. The postoperative survivals of large HCC patients are significantly improved by anterior approach right hepatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20979874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi        ISSN: 0376-2491


  5 in total

Review 1.  Anterior vs conventional approach hepatectomy for large liver cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Li; Hai-Qing Wang; Qing Wang; Jian Yang; Jia-Yin Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  The liver hanging maneuver in laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rami Rhaiem; Tullio Piardi; Tarek Kellil; Audrey Cagniet; Mikael Chetboun; Reza Kianmanesh; Daniele Sommacale
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Modified hanging manoeuvre facilitates inferior vena cava resection and reconstruction during extended right hepatectomy: A technical case report.

Authors:  Shamir O Cawich; Dexter A W Thomas; Vindra Ragoonanan; Chunilal Ramjit; Dylan Narinesingh; Vijay Naraynsingh; Neil Pearce
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-28

4.  Anterior approach combined with infrahepatic inferior vena cava clamping right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yan-Ming Zhou; Cheng-Jun Sui; Xiao-Feng Zhang; Bin Li; Jia-Mei Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Anterior vs conventional approach right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian-Xin Tang; Jin-Jun Li; Rui-Hui Weng; Zi-Ming Liang; Nan Jiang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.