Richard W Steketee1, Carlos C Campbell. 1. Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), PATH 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121 USA. rsteketee@path.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since 2005, malaria control scale-up has progressed in many African countries. Controlled studies of insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) and malaria case management suggested that when incorporated into national programmes a dramatic health impact, likely more than a 20% decrease in all-cause childhood mortality, was possible. To assess the extent to which national malaria programmes are achieving impact the authors reviewed African country programme data available through 2009. METHODS: National survey data, published literature, and organization or country reports produced during 2000-2009 were reviewed to assess available malaria financing, intervention delivery, household or target population coverage, and reported health benefits including infection, illness, severe anaemia, and death. RESULTS: By the end of 2009, reports were available for ITN household ownership (n = 34) and IPTp use (n = 27) in malaria-endemic countries in Africa, with at least two estimates (pre-2005 and post-2005 intervals). Information linking IRS and case management coverage to impact were more limited. There was generally at least a three-fold increase in household ITN ownership across these countries between pre-2005 (median of 2.4% of households with at least one ITN) and post-2005 (median of 32.5% of households with at least one ITN). Ten countries had temporal data to assess programme impact, and all reported progress on at least one impact indicator (typically on mortality); in under-five year mortality rates most observed a decline of more than 20%. The causal relationship between malaria programme scale-up and reduced child illness and mortality rates is supported by biologic plausibility including mortality declines consistent with experience from intervention efficacy trials, consistency of findings across multiple countries and different epidemiologic settings, and temporal congruity where morbidity and mortality declines have been documented in the 18 to 36 months following intervention scale-up. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors potentially have contributed to recent health improvement in African countries, but there is substantial evidence that achieving high malaria control intervention coverage, especially with ITNs and targeted IRS, has been the leading contributor to reduced child mortality. The documented impact provides the evidence required to support a global commitment to the expansion and long-term investment in malaria control to sustain and increase the health impact that malaria control is producing in Africa.
BACKGROUND: Since 2005, malaria control scale-up has progressed in many African countries. Controlled studies of insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) and malaria case management suggested that when incorporated into national programmes a dramatic health impact, likely more than a 20% decrease in all-cause childhood mortality, was possible. To assess the extent to which national malaria programmes are achieving impact the authors reviewed African country programme data available through 2009. METHODS: National survey data, published literature, and organization or country reports produced during 2000-2009 were reviewed to assess available malaria financing, intervention delivery, household or target population coverage, and reported health benefits including infection, illness, severe anaemia, and death. RESULTS: By the end of 2009, reports were available for ITN household ownership (n = 34) and IPTp use (n = 27) in malaria-endemic countries in Africa, with at least two estimates (pre-2005 and post-2005 intervals). Information linking IRS and case management coverage to impact were more limited. There was generally at least a three-fold increase in household ITN ownership across these countries between pre-2005 (median of 2.4% of households with at least one ITN) and post-2005 (median of 32.5% of households with at least one ITN). Ten countries had temporal data to assess programme impact, and all reported progress on at least one impact indicator (typically on mortality); in under-five year mortality rates most observed a decline of more than 20%. The causal relationship between malaria programme scale-up and reduced child illness and mortality rates is supported by biologic plausibility including mortality declines consistent with experience from intervention efficacy trials, consistency of findings across multiple countries and different epidemiologic settings, and temporal congruity where morbidity and mortality declines have been documented in the 18 to 36 months following intervention scale-up. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors potentially have contributed to recent health improvement in African countries, but there is substantial evidence that achieving high malaria control intervention coverage, especially with ITNs and targeted IRS, has been the leading contributor to reduced child mortality. The documented impact provides the evidence required to support a global commitment to the expansion and long-term investment in malaria control to sustain and increase the health impact that malaria control is producing in Africa.
Authors: Patricia M Graves; Daniel E Osgood; Madeleine C Thomson; Kiros Sereke; Afwerki Araia; Mehari Zerom; Pietro Ceccato; Michael Bell; John Del Corral; Shashu Ghebreselassie; Eugene P Brantly; Tewolde Ghebremeskel Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Asnakew K Yeshiwondim; Sucharita Gopal; Afework T Hailemariam; Dereje O Dengela; Hrishikesh P Patel Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Gerry F Killeen; Tom A Smith; Heather M Ferguson; Hassan Mshinda; Salim Abdulla; Christian Lengeler; Steven P Kachur Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Achuyt Bhattarai; Abdullah S Ali; S Patrick Kachur; Andreas Mårtensson; Ali K Abbas; Rashid Khatib; Abdul-Wahiyd Al-Mafazy; Mahdi Ramsan; Guida Rotllant; Jan F Gerstenmaier; Fabrizio Molteni; Salim Abdulla; Scott M Montgomery; Akira Kaneko; Anders Björkman Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-11-06 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Diana Khuu; Mark L Eberhard; Benjamin N Bristow; Marjan Javanbakht; Lawrence R Ash; Shira C Shafir; Frank J Sorvillo Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Olubukola T Idoko; Sonali Kochhar; Tsiri E Agbenyega; Bernhards Ogutu; Martin O C Ota Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Yeung L Tutterrow; Marion Avril; Kavita Singh; Carole A Long; Robert J Leke; Grace Sama; Ali Salanti; Joseph D Smith; Rose G F Leke; Diane W Taylor Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Emma C Wall; Dean B Everett; Mavuto Mukaka; Naor Bar-Zeev; Nicholas Feasey; Andreas Jahn; Mike Moore; Joep J van Oosterhout; Paul Pensalo; Kenneth Baguimira; Stephen B Gordon; Elizabeth M Molyneux; Enitan D Carrol; Neil French; Malcolm E Molyneux; Robert S Heyderman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jeroen Spitzen; Camille Ponzio; Constantianus J M Koenraadt; Helen V Pates Jamet; Willem Takken Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Elizabeth M McClure; Steven R Meshnick; Noam Lazebnik; Peter Mungai; Christopher L King; Michael Hudgens; Robert L Goldenberg; Anna-Maria Siega-Riz; Arlene E Dent Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Jordan E Cates; Daniel Westreich; Holger W Unger; Melissa Bauserman; Linda Adair; Stephen R Cole; Steven Meshnick; Stephen J Rogerson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 9.308