Literature DB >> 20978636

Testing adhesion of direct restoratives to dental hard tissue - a review.

Ulrich Salz1, Thorsten Bock.   

Abstract

This articles concerns itself with the testing of adhesion between direct restoratives and dental hard tissue, ie, enamel and dentin. The aim is to survey available methods for adhesion testing and influential parameters affecting experimental outcome. The testing of adhesion to indirect restorative materials, eg, ceramics and metals, is beyond the scope of this article and shall be discussed elsewhere. The longevity and success of modern dental restorations very often relies on potent dental adhesives to provide durable bonds between the dental hard substance and the restorative composite. To predict the clinical outcome of such restorative treatment, a large variety of in vitro laboratory tests and clinical in vivo experiments have been devised, analyzed, and published. The purpose of this review is to provide a current overview of bond strength testing methods and their applicability to the characterization of dental adhesives. Regardless of the method employed, subtle variations in sample preparation may already severely impact test results, usually necessitating at least co-testing of a well-known internal reference to allow conclusive interpretation. This article attempts to list and discuss the most influential parameters, such as substrate nature, age, health status, storage, clinically relevant pre-treatment, and sample preparation. Special attention is devoted to the last aspect, as numerous publications have stressed the tremendous influence of preparatory parameters on the validity and scope of obtained data. Added to the large variety of such factors, an equally large diversity of load-applying procedures exists to actually quantify adhesion between composites and dental hard substance. This article summarizes the basics of macro and micro approaches to shear and tensile bond strength testing, as well as push- and pull-out tests. The strengths and weaknesses inherent to each method and influential test parameters are reviewed and methods for accelerated sample aging and simulation of clinical conditions presented. Alternatively to shear or tensile bond strength tests, fracture toughness is introduced together with its application to dental adhesives and an overview of its physical background.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20978636     DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a19741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adhes Dent        ISSN: 1461-5185            Impact factor:   2.359


  13 in total

1.  Shear bond strength of different types of adhesive systems to dentin and enamel of deciduous teeth in vitro.

Authors:  A Kensche; F Dähne; C Wagenschwanz; G Richter; G Viergutz; C Hannig
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Tensile bond characteristics between composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer restoratives used in the open-sandwich technique.

Authors:  S Fragkou; A Nikolaidis; D Tsiantou; D Achilias; N Kotsanos
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-06-27

3.  Influence of dentin and enamel pretreatment with acidic sulfur compounds on adhesive performance.

Authors:  Alexis Ioannidis; Bogna Stawarczyk; Beatrice Sener; Thomas Attin; Patrick R Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Does the etching strategy influence the bonding of universal adhesive systems to primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

Authors:  T T Fröhlich; L D Gindri; F Z M Soares; R de Oliveira Rocha
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 5.  Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review: Part I.

Authors:  Kantheti Sirisha; Tankonda Rambabu; Yalavarthi Ravi Shankar; Pabbati Ravikumar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-07

6.  Rubbing time and bonding performance of one-step adhesives to primary enamel and dentin.

Authors:  Maria Paula Jacobucci Botelho; Cristina Pereira Isolan; Júlia Kaster Schwantz; Murilo Baena Lopes; Rafael Ratto de Moraes
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Silorane-Based Composite Resin and Methacrylate Based Composite Resin to MTA.

Authors:  Buse Ayse Serin; Muharrem Cem Dogan; Hamdi Oguz Yoldas
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2018-03-14

8.  Microleakage of conventional light-cure resin-based fissure sealant and resin-modified glass ionomer sealant after application of a fluoride varnish on demineralized enamel.

Authors:  Concepción Germán-Cecilia; Sandra María Gallego Reyes; Amparo Pérez Silva; Clara Serna Muñoz; Antonio José Ortiz-Ruiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of 2% Chlorhexidine on Resin Bond Strength and Mode of Failure Using Two Different Adhesives on Dentin: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Sreeram Rayar; Kadandale Sadasiva; Prabath Singh; Preethee Thomas; Kumarappan Senthilkumar; Udayakumar Jayasimharaj
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2019-05

10.  Dentin to dentin adhesion using combinations of resin cements and adhesives from different manufacturers - a novel approach.

Authors:  Elke Seitz; Carl Hjortsjö; Jon E Dahl; Erik Saxegaard
Journal:  Biomater Investig Dent       Date:  2020-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.