Weijing He1, John Castiblanco, Elizabeth A Walter, Jason F Okulicz, Sunil K Ahuja. 1. Veterans Administration Research Center for AIDS and HIV-1 Infection, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is unknown whether biomarkers simply correlate with or are causal for HIV-associated outcomes. Mendelian randomization is a genetic epidemiologic approach used to disentangle causation from association. Here, we discuss the potential use of Mendelian randomization for differentiating whether biomarkers are correlating with or causal for HIV-associated outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Mendelian randomization refers to the random allocation of alleles at the time of gamete formation. In observational epidemiology, this refers to the use of genetic variants to estimate a causal effect between a modifiable risk factor and an outcome of interest. A formal Mendelian randomization study using a genetic marker as a proxy for the biomarker has not been conducted in the HIV field. However, in the postgenomic era, this approach is being used increasingly. Examples are evidence for the causal role of BMI in blood pressure and noncausal role of C-reactive protein in coronary heart disease. We discuss the conceptual framework, uses, and limitations of Mendelian randomization in the context of HIV infection as well as specific biomarkers (IL-6, C-reactive protein) and genetic determinants (e.g., in CCR5, chemokine, and DARC genes) that associate with HIV-related outcomes. SUMMARY: Making the distinction between correlation and causality has particular relevance when a biomarker (e.g., IL-6) is potentially modifiable, in which case a biomarker-guided targeted treatment strategy may be feasible. Although the tenets of Mendelian randomization rest on strong assumptions, and conducting a Mendelian randomization study in HIV infection presents many challenges, it may offer the potential to identify causal biomarkers for HIV-associated outcomes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is unknown whether biomarkers simply correlate with or are causal for HIV-associated outcomes. Mendelian randomization is a genetic epidemiologic approach used to disentangle causation from association. Here, we discuss the potential use of Mendelian randomization for differentiating whether biomarkers are correlating with or causal for HIV-associated outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Mendelian randomization refers to the random allocation of alleles at the time of gamete formation. In observational epidemiology, this refers to the use of genetic variants to estimate a causal effect between a modifiable risk factor and an outcome of interest. A formal Mendelian randomization study using a genetic marker as a proxy for the biomarker has not been conducted in the HIV field. However, in the postgenomic era, this approach is being used increasingly. Examples are evidence for the causal role of BMI in blood pressure and noncausal role of C-reactive protein in coronary heart disease. We discuss the conceptual framework, uses, and limitations of Mendelian randomization in the context of HIV infection as well as specific biomarkers (IL-6, C-reactive protein) and genetic determinants (e.g., in CCR5, chemokine, and DARC genes) that associate with HIV-related outcomes. SUMMARY: Making the distinction between correlation and causality has particular relevance when a biomarker (e.g., IL-6) is potentially modifiable, in which case a biomarker-guided targeted treatment strategy may be feasible. Although the tenets of Mendelian randomization rest on strong assumptions, and conducting a Mendelian randomization study in HIV infection presents many challenges, it may offer the potential to identify causal biomarkers for HIV-associated outcomes.
Authors: T R O'Brien; D H McDermott; J P Ioannidis; M Carrington; P M Murphy; D V Havlir; D D Richman Journal: AIDS Date: 2000-05-05 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Matthew J Dolan; Hemant Kulkarni; Jose F Camargo; Weijing He; Alison Smith; Juan-Manuel Anaya; Toshiyuki Miura; Frederick M Hecht; Manju Mamtani; Florencia Pereyra; Vincent Marconi; Andrea Mangano; Luisa Sen; Rosa Bologna; Robert A Clark; Stephanie A Anderson; Judith Delmar; Robert J O'Connell; Andrew Lloyd; Jeffrey Martin; Seema S Ahuja; Brian K Agan; Bruce D Walker; Steven G Deeks; Sunil K Ahuja Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2007-10-21 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Weijing He; Stuart Neil; Hemant Kulkarni; Edward Wright; Brian K Agan; Vincent C Marconi; Matthew J Dolan; Robin A Weiss; Sunil K Ahuja Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: Florian B Mayr; Alexander O Spiel; Judith M Leitner; Christa Firbas; Tuende Kliegel; Petra Jilma-Stohlawetz; Hartmut Derendorf; Bernd Jilma Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Sher L Hendrickson; Lisa P Jacobson; George W Nelson; John P Phair; James Lautenberger; Randall C Johnson; Lawrence Kingsley; Joseph B Margolick; Roger Detels; James J Goedert; Stephen J O'Brien Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Shaoyong Su; Harold Snieder; Andrew H Miller; James Ritchie; J Douglas Bremner; Jack Goldberg; Jun Dai; Linda Jones; Nancy V Murrah; Jinying Zhao; Viola Vaccarino Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2008-02-20 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Tiffanie K Jones; Rui Feng; V Eric Kerchberger; John P Reilly; Brian J Anderson; Michael G S Shashaty; Fan Wang; Thomas G Dunn; Thomas R Riley; Jason Abbott; Caroline A G Ittner; David C Christiani; Carmen Mikacenic; Mark M Wurfel; Lorraine B Ware; Carolyn S Calfee; Michael A Matthay; Jason D Christie; Nuala J Meyer Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: John P Reilly; Fan Wang; Tiffanie K Jones; Jessica A Palakshappa; Brian J Anderson; Michael G S Shashaty; Thomas G Dunn; Erik D Johansson; Thomas R Riley; Brian Lim; Jason Abbott; Caroline A G Ittner; Edward Cantu; Xihong Lin; Carmen Mikacenic; Mark M Wurfel; David C Christiani; Carolyn S Calfee; Michael A Matthay; Jason D Christie; Rui Feng; Nuala J Meyer Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-10-21 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jelena Malogajski; Ivan Brankovic; Stephan P Verweij; Elena Ambrosino; Michiel A van Agtmael; Angela Brand; Sander Ouburg; Servaas A Morré Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Dan Hameiri-Bowen; Evgeniya Sovershaeva; Trond Flaegstad; Tore Jarl Gutteberg; Lucky Gift Ngwira; Victoria Simms; Andrea M Rehman; Grace Mchugh; Tsitsi Bandason; Rashida Abbas Ferrand; Sarah Rowland-Jones; Louis-Marie Yindom Journal: AIDS Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 4.632