Literature DB >> 20978320

Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study.

Cathy B Moelans1, Roel A de Weger, Hanneke N Monsuur, Anoek H J Maes, Paul J van Diest.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for approximately 20% of mammographically detected breast cancers. Although DCIS is generally highly curable, some women with DCIS will develop life-threatening invasive breast cancer, but the determinants of progression to infiltrating ductal cancer (IDC) are largely unknown. In the current study, we used multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), a multiplex PCR-based test, to compare copy numbers of 21 breast cancer related genes between laser-microdissected DCIS and adjacent IDC lesions in 39 patients. Genes included in this study were ESR1, EGFR, FGFR1, ADAM9, IKBKB, PRDM14, MTDH, MYC, CCND1, EMSY, CDH1, TRAF4, CPD, MED1, HER2, CDC6, TOP2A, MAPT, BIRC5, CCNE1 and AURKA.There were no significant differences in copy number for the 21 genes between DCIS and adjacent IDC. Low/intermediate-grade DCIS showed on average 6 gains/amplifications versus 8 in high-grade DCIS (p=0.158). Furthermore, alterations of AURKA and CCNE1 were exclusively found in high-grade DCIS, and HER2, PRDM14 and EMSY amplification was more frequent in high-grade DCIS than in low/intermediate-grade DCIS. In contrast, the average number of alterations in low/intermediate and high-grade IDC was similar, and although EGFR alterations were exclusively found in high-grade IDC compared to low/intermediate-grade IDC, there were generally fewer differences between low/intermediate-grade and high-grade IDC than between low/intermediate-grade and high-grade DCIS.In conclusion, there were no significant differences in copy number for 21 breast cancer related genes between DCIS and adjacent IDC, indicating that DCIS is genetically as advanced as its invasive counterpart. However, high-grade DCIS showed more copy number changes than low/intermediate-grade DCIS with specifically involved genes, supporting a model in which different histological grades of DCIS are associated with distinct genomic changes that progress to IDC in different routes. These high-grade DCIS specific genes may be potential targets for treatment and/or predict progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20978320      PMCID: PMC4605452          DOI: 10.3233/ACP-CLO-2010-0546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol (Amst)        ISSN: 2210-7177            Impact factor:   2.916


  14 in total

1.  On the evidence for ESR1 amplification in breast cancer.

Authors:  Frederik Holst; Cathy B Moelans; Martin Filipits; Christian F Singer; Ronald Simon; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Off to a Bad Start: Cancer Initiation by Pluripotency Regulator PRDM14.

Authors:  Lauren J Tracey; Monica J Justice
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 3.  Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Chaos and Consequence.

Authors:  Vidya C Sinha; Helen Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 4.  Estrogen receptor alpha gene amplification in breast cancer: 25 years of debate.

Authors:  Frederik Holst
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-10

Review 5.  Dysregulation of histone methyltransferases in breast cancer - Opportunities for new targeted therapies?

Authors:  Ewa M Michalak; Jane E Visvader
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 6.  Clinical implications of cancer self-seeding.

Authors:  Elizabeth Comen; Larry Norton; Joan Massagué
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Chromosome 1q25.3 copy number alterations in primary breast cancers detected by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and allelic imbalance assays and its comparison with fluorescent in situ hybridization assays.

Authors:  Emilia Wiechec; Jens Overgaard; Eigil Kjeldsen; Lise Lotte Hansen
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 6.730

8.  Single-cell genetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer reveals enormous tumor heterogeneity yet conserved genomic imbalances and gain of MYC during progression.

Authors:  Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Lissa Y Berroa Garcia; Amanda Bradley; Clarymar Ortiz-Melendez; Woei-Jyh Lee; Rebecca Christensen; Sheila A Prindiville; Kathleen A Calzone; Peter W Soballe; Yue Hu; Salim A Chowdhury; Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of the Progression from Non-Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Fresia Pareja; David N Brown; Ju Youn Lee; Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Pier Selenica; Rui Bi; Felipe C Geyer; Andrea Gazzo; Edaise M da Silva; Mahsa Vahdatinia; Anthe A Stylianou; Lorenzo Ferrando; Hannah Y Wen; James B Hicks; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Analysis of gene copy number alterations by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in columnar cell lesions of the breast.

Authors:  Anoek H J Verschuur-Maes; Cathy B Moelans; Peter C de Bruin; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.