Literature DB >> 20978247

The duration of residual neuromuscular block after administration of neostigmine or sugammadex at two visible twitches during train-of-four monitoring.

Hanna L Illman1, Päivi Laurila, Heikki Antila, Olli A Meretoja, Seppo Alahuhta, Klaus T Olkkola.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adequate recovery from neuromuscular block (NMB) is imperative for the patient to have full control of pharyngeal and respiratory muscles. The train-of-4 (TOF) ratio should return to at least 0.90 to exclude potentially clinically significant postoperative residual block. Fade cannot be detected reliably with a peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) at a TOF ratio >0.4. The time gap between loss of visual fade by using a PNS until objective TOF ratio has returned to >0.90 can be considered "the potentially unsafe period of recovery." According to our hypothesis the duration of this period would be significantly shorter with sugammadex than with neostigmine.
METHODS: Fifty patients received volatile anesthetics, opioids, and a rocuronium-induced NMB. TOF-Watch without a preload was used, but the anesthesiologist relied on visual evaluation of the TOF responses only. At end of operation, patients were randomized to receive either neostigmine 50 μg/kg or sugammadex 2 mg/kg, when 2 twitch responses were detected after the last dose of rocuronium. Timing of tracheal extubation was based on PNS and clinical data. Duration of the potentially unsafe period of recovery after reversal by either neostigmine or sugammadex was analyzed. Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson χ(2) test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The times [mean ± sd (range)] from loss of visual fade to TOF ratio >0.90 were 10.3 ± 5.5 (1.3 to 26.0) minutes and 0.3 ± 0.3 (0.0 to 1.0) minutes in the neostigmine and sugammadex groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The times from reversal by neostigmine or sugammadex to TOF ratio >0.90 were 13.3 ± 5.7 (3.5 to 28.9) and 1.7 ± 0.7 (0.7 to 3.5) minutes, respectively (P < 0.001). The values of TOF ratios at the time of loss of visual fade were 0.34 ± 0.14 (0.00 to 0.56) in patients given neostigmine and 0.86 ± 0.11 (0.64 to 1.04) in patients given sugammadex (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant time gap between visual loss of fade and return of TOF ratio >0.90 after reversal of a rocuronium block by neostigmine. Sugammadex in comparison with neostigmine allows a safer reversal of a moderate NMB when relying on visual evaluation of the TOF response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20978247     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fdf889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  11 in total

1.  Intraoperative reversal of neuromuscular block with sugammadex or neostigmine during extreme lateral interbody fusion, a novel technique for spine surgery.

Authors:  Milan Adamus; Lumir Hrabalek; Tomas Wanek; Tomas Gabrhelik; Jana Zapletalova
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Sugammadex: An Update.

Authors:  Tiberiu Ezri; Mona Boaz; Alexander Sherman; Marwan Armaly; Yitzhak Berlovitz
Journal:  J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures)       Date:  2016-02-09

3.  Neostigmine Versus Sugammadex for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade and Effects on Reintubation for Respiratory Failure or Newly Initiated Noninvasive Ventilation: An Interrupted Time Series Design.

Authors:  Martin Krause; Shannon K McWilliams; Kenneth J Bullard; Lena M Mayes; Leslie C Jameson; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson; Ana Fernandez-Bustamante; Karsten Bartels
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  A Comparision of the Effect of Sugammadex on the Recovery Period and Postoperative Residual Block in Young Elderly and Middle-Aged Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Emine Yazar; Canan Yılmaz; Hülya Bilgin; Derya Karasu; Selcan Bayraktar; Yılmaz Apaydın; Halil Erkan Sayan
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.021

Review 5.  Efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults.

Authors:  Ana-Marija Hristovska; Patricia Duch; Mikkel Allingstrup; Arash Afshari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-14

Review 6.  Sugammadex: A Review of Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Sugammadex in awakening from general anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adriano Anzai; Armelin Utino; Giuliano Tosello; Haroldo Katayama; Ighor Alexander Zamuner Spir; Luca Schiliró Tristão; Mary Martins Nery; Mauricio Anhesini; Osvaldo Silvestrini Tiezzi; Patricia Rodrigues Naufal Spir; Pericles Otani; Wanderley Marques Bernado
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.712

8.  Sugammadex for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in pediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Young Ju Won; Byung Gun Lim; Dong Kyu Lee; Heezoo Kim; Myoung Hoon Kong; Il Ok Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  The use of sugammadex in a patient with Kennedy's disease under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Risa Takeuchi; Hiroshi Hoshijima; Katsushi Doi; Hiroshi Nagasaka
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-07

10.  Sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in a single center.

Authors:  Michele Carron; Fabio Baratto; Francesco Zarantonello; Carlo Ori
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2016-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.