Literature DB >> 20978032

Combinations of prognostic tools for identification of high-risk normotensive patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.

David Jiménez1, Drahomir Aujesky, Lisa Moores, Vicente Gómez, David Martí, Sem Briongos, Manuel Monreal, Vivencio Barrios, Stavros Konstantinides, Roger D Yusen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In haemodynamically stable patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), studies have not evaluated the usefulness of combining the measurement of cardiac troponin, transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), and lower extremity complete compression ultrasound (CCUS) testing for predicting the risk of PE-related death.
METHODS: The study assessed the ability of three diagnostic tests (cardiac troponin I (cTnI), echocardiogram, and CCUS) to prognosticate the primary outcome of PE-related mortality during 30 days of follow-up after a diagnosis of PE by objective testing.
RESULTS: Of 591 normotensive patients diagnosed with PE, the primary outcome occurred in 37 patients (6.3%; 95% CI 4.3% to 8.2%). Patients with right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) by TTE and concomitant deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by CCUS had a PE-related mortality of 19.6%, compared with 17.1% of patients with elevated cTnI and concomitant DVT and 15.2% of patients with elevated cTnI and RVD. The use of any two-test strategy had a higher specificity and positive predictive value compared with the use of any test by itself. A combined three-test strategy did not further improve prognostication. For a subgroup analysis of high-risk patients, according to the pulmonary embolism severity index (classes IV and V), positive predictive values of the two-test strategies for PE-related mortality were 25.0%, 24.4% and 20.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In haemodynamically stable patients with acute symptomatic PE, a combination of echocardiography (or troponin testing) and CCUS improved prognostication compared with the use of any test by itself for the identification of those at high risk of PE-related death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20978032     DOI: 10.1136/thx.2010.150656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  21 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of multidetector computed tomography in normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism: rationale, methodology and reproducibility for the PROTECT study.

Authors:  David Jiménez; José Luis Lobo; Manuel Monreal; Remedios Otero; Roger D Yusen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Venous thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  Michael B Streiff; Paula L Bockenstedt; Spero R Cataland; Carolyn Chesney; Charles Eby; John Fanikos; Patrick F Fogarty; Shuwei Gao; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Hani Hassoun; Paul Hendrie; Bjorn Holmstrom; Kimberly A Jones; Nicole Kuderer; Jason T Lee; Michael M Millenson; Anne T Neff; Thomas L Ortel; Judy L Smith; Gary C Yee; Anaadriana Zakarija
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Comparison of clinical scores for identification of patients with pulmonary embolism at intermediate-high risk of adverse clinical outcome: the prognostic role of plasma lactate.

Authors:  Simone Vanni; Peiman Nazerian; Carlo Bova; Ernesta Bondi; Fulvio Morello; Giuseppe Pepe; Barbara Paladini; Giovanni Liedl; Elisabetta Cangioli; Stefano Grifoni; David Jiménez
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  The accuracy of combined use of troponin and red cell distribution width in predicting mortality of patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Selçuk Yazıcı; Tuncay Kırış; Ufuk S Ceylan; Şükrü Akyüz; Ahmet O Uzun; Recep Hacı; Sait Terzi; Abdullah Doğan; Ayşe Emre; Kemal Yeşilçimen
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 5.  Prognostic Value of Biomarkers in Acute Non-massive Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anurag Bajaj; Parul Rathor; Vishal Sehgal; Besher Kabak; Ajay Shetty; Ossama Al Masalmeh; Srikanth Hosur
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.584

6.  Impact of relative contraindications to home management in emergency department patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  David R Vinson; Carrieann E Drenten; Jie Huang; J Eileen Morley; Megan L Anderson; Mary E Reed; Daniel K Nishijima; Vincent Liu
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-05

7.  The safety and efficacy of systemic versus catheter-based therapies: application of a prognostic model by a pulmonary embolism response team.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Iskandar; Essa Hariri; Christopher Kanaan; Nicholas Kassis; Hayaan Kamran; Denise Sese; Colin Wright; Mark Marinescu; Scott J Cameron
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Risk stratification of patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  David Jiménez; Jose Luis Lobo; Deisy Barrios; Paolo Prandoni; Roger D Yusen
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 9.  The prognostic value of pulmonary embolism severity index in acute pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Zhou; Su-Qin Ben; Hong-Lin Chen; Song-Shi Ni
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2012-12-04

10.  Plasma levels of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA in patients with massive pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Francisco Arnalich; Maria Constanza Maldifassi; Enrique Ciria; Rosa Codoceo; Jaime Renart; Carmen Fernández-Capitán; Rafael Herruzo; Francisco Garcia-Rio; Eduardo López-Collazo; Carmen Montiel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.