Literature DB >> 20976381

Radiographic quality of root canal fillings performed in a postgraduate program in endodontics.

Suelleng Maria Cunha Santos1, Janir Alves Soares, Carlos Augusto Santos César, Manoel Brito-Júnior, Allyson Nogueira Moreira, Cláudia Silami de Magalhães.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the standard quality of 1,347 root fillings performed by postgraduate students in Endodontics according to 3 radiographic quality parameters. The analyzed quality parameters included apical extension (AE), taper (TA) and homogeneity (HO), which received scores S2 (ideal standard), S1 (slight deviation) or S0 (accentuated deviation). A perfect filling (PF) received S2 for all parameters. In the absence of one or two S2 score, the fillings were deemed as satisfactory (SF) or deficient (DF), respectively. The results showed 51.7%, 41.5% and 6.8% of PF, SF, and DF, respectively. AE, TA, and HO presented equivalent quality parameters in root-filled canals of mandibular incisors and mandibular premolars (p>0.05). Conversely, in maxillary incisors, canines and distal root of mandibular molars, significant differences (p<0.05) were found between 2 parameters. Besides, there were significant differences (p<0.05) among the measured parameters in root-filled canals of maxillary premolars, all root canals of the maxillary molars and mesial root of the mandibular molars. AE showed the lowest frequency of S2 score for all groups. In conclusion the prevalence of perfect, satisfactory and deficient fillings varied significantly according to the root canal group. The quality parameters categorized fillings in 3 complexity degrees. AE was the most critical parameter of quality in root canal fillings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20976381     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000400005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  5 in total

1.  Comparing cone-beam computed tomography with periapical radiography for assessing root canal obturation in vivo using microsurgical findings as validation.

Authors:  Dongzhe Song; Lan Zhang; Wei Zhou; Qinghua Zheng; Xingyu Duan; Xuedong Zhou; Dingming Huang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Orlando Aguirre Guedes; Marcus Vinícius Corrêa da Costa; Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati Dorilêo; Helder Fernandes de Oliveira; Fábio Luis Miranda Pedro; Matheus Coelho Bandeca; Álvaro Henrique Borges
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-03

3.  Occurrence and risk factors of dental root perforations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simran Kaur Sarao; Yuli Berlin-Broner; Liran Levin
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.607

4.  Technical quality of root canal therapies performed by novice dental students in preclinical practice.

Authors:  Mahmood Reza Kalantar Motamedi; Seyed Hamid Reza Davoodi; Alireza Saeidi; Behnaz Barekatain; Hamid Noormohammadi; Hamid Razavian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

5.  Technical Quality of Root Canal Treatment Performed by Undergraduate Clinical Students of Isfahan Dental School.

Authors:  Masoud Saatchi; Golshan Mohammadi; Armita Vali Sichani; Saba Moshkforoush
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2018
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.