| Literature DB >> 20975929 |
Gilberto Santos Andrade1, José Eduardo Serrão, José Cola Zanuncio, Teresinha Vinha Zanuncio, Germano Leão Demolin Leite, Ricardo Antonio Polanczyk.
Abstract
Interactions of the parasitoids Palmistichus elaeisis Delvare & LaSalle and Trichospilus diatraeae Cherian & Margabandhu (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) with its alternative host Anticarsia gemmatalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) affect the success or failure of the mass production of these parasitoids for use in integrated pest management programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the cellular defense and encapsulation ability of A. gemmatalis pupae against P. elaeisis or T. diatraeae in adult parasitoid densities of 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 or 13 parasitoids/pupae. We evaluated the total quantity of circulating hemocytes and the encapsulation rate versus density. Increasing parasitoid density reduced the total number of hemocytes in the hemolymph and the encapsulation rate by parasitized pupae. Furthermore, densities of P. elaeisis above 5 parasitoids/pupae caused higher reduction in total hemocyte numbers. The encapsulation rate fell with increasing parasitoid density. However, parasitic invasion by both species induced generally similar responses. The reduction in defensive capacity of A. gemmatalis is related to the adjustment of the density of these parasitoids to their development in this host. Thus, the role of the density of P. elaeisis or T. diatraeae by pupa is induced suppression of cellular defense and encapsulation of the host, even without them possesses a co-evolutionary history. Furthermore, these findings can predict the success of P. elaeisis and T. diatraeae in the control of insect pests through the use of immunology as a tool for evaluation of natural enemies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20975929 PMCID: PMC2958748 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Hemocyte (mean ± se) of Anticarsia gemmatalis pupae parasitized by densities of Palmistichus elaeisis or Trichospilus diatraeae.
Figure 2Total granulocyte (mean ± se) of Anticarsia gemmatalis pupae parasitized by densities of Palmistichus elaeisis or Trichospilus diatraeae.
Figure 3Total plasmatocytes (mean ± se) of Anticarsia gemmatalis pupaeparasitized by densities of Palmistichus elaeisis or Trichospilus diatraeae.
Figure 4Total of other cell types (mean ± se) of Anticarsia gemmatalis pupae parasitized by densities of Palmistichus elaeisis or Trichospilus diatraeae.
Figure 5Encapsulation rate pupae of Anticarsia gemmatalis pupae parasitized by densities of Palmistichus elaeisis or Trichospilus diatraeae.