Samara R Zavalkoff1, Saleem I Razack, Josée Lavoie, Adrian B Dancea. 1. Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. samara.zavalkoff@mcgill.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality of handover of complex patients after pediatric cardiac surgery through the use of a simple handover tool. DESIGN: Prospective, pre-/postinterventional. SETTING: A tertiary care, pediatric intensive care unit in North America. SUBJECTS: Thirty-three consenting healthcare providers from pediatric cardiac anesthesia, critical care, and cardiothoracic surgery participating in 31 handovers. INTERVENTION: A fill-in-the-blank, one-page tool was developed to guide the information transmitted by the surgeon and anesthesiologist to the pediatric intensive care unit team during handover of postcardiac surgery patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Total handover score, four subscores, handover duration, and postoperative high-risk events were measured before and after introducing the tool into clinical practice. The patients in both the pre- and postintervention groups were similar at baseline. The total handover score (maximum 43 points) improved significantly after the implementation of the handover tool (28.2 of 43 ± 4.6 points vs. 33.5 of 43 ± 3.7 points, p = .002). There was also a significant improvement in the medical (8.3 ± 2.6 vs. 10.3 ± 2.1 points, p = .024) and surgical (7.5 ± 1.4 vs. 9.3 ± 1.6 points, p = .002) intraoperative information subscores. Use of the tool did not prolong handover duration (8.3 ± 4.6 vs. 11.1 ± 3.9 mins, p = .1). There was a trend toward more patients being free from high-risk events in the postintervention group (31.2% vs. 6.7%), but this did not reach statistical significance (p = .1). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a simple tool during handover of pediatric postcardiac surgery patients resulted in a more complete exchange of critical information with no significant prolongation of the handover duration.
OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality of handover of complex patients after pediatric cardiac surgery through the use of a simple handover tool. DESIGN: Prospective, pre-/postinterventional. SETTING: A tertiary care, pediatric intensive care unit in North America. SUBJECTS: Thirty-three consenting healthcare providers from pediatric cardiac anesthesia, critical care, and cardiothoracic surgery participating in 31 handovers. INTERVENTION: A fill-in-the-blank, one-page tool was developed to guide the information transmitted by the surgeon and anesthesiologist to the pediatric intensive care unit team during handover of postcardiac surgery patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Total handover score, four subscores, handover duration, and postoperative high-risk events were measured before and after introducing the tool into clinical practice. The patients in both the pre- and postintervention groups were similar at baseline. The total handover score (maximum 43 points) improved significantly after the implementation of the handover tool (28.2 of 43 ± 4.6 points vs. 33.5 of 43 ± 3.7 points, p = .002). There was also a significant improvement in the medical (8.3 ± 2.6 vs. 10.3 ± 2.1 points, p = .024) and surgical (7.5 ± 1.4 vs. 9.3 ± 1.6 points, p = .002) intraoperative information subscores. Use of the tool did not prolong handover duration (8.3 ± 4.6 vs. 11.1 ± 3.9 mins, p = .1). There was a trend toward more patients being free from high-risk events in the postintervention group (31.2% vs. 6.7%), but this did not reach statistical significance (p = .1). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a simple tool during handover of pediatric postcardiac surgery patients resulted in a more complete exchange of critical information with no significant prolongation of the handover duration.
Authors: Noa Segall; Alberto S Bonifacio; Rebecca A Schroeder; Atilio Barbeito; Dawn Rogers; Deirdre K Thornlow; James Emery; Sally Kellum; Melanie C Wright; Jonathan B Mark Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Noa Segall; Alberto S Bonifacio; Atilio Barbeito; Rebecca A Schroeder; Sharon R Perfect; Melanie C Wright; James D Emery; B Zane Atkins; Jeffrey M Taekman; Jonathan B Mark Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2016-09
Authors: Lisa M McElroy; Kelly M Collins; Felicitas L Koller; Rebeca Khorzad; Michael M Abecassis; Jane L Holl; Daniela P Ladner Journal: Surgery Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Lisa M McElroy; Kathryn R Macapagal; Kelly M Collins; Michael M Abecassis; Jane L Holl; Daniela P Ladner; Elisa J Gordon Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Abigail R Wooldridge; Pascale Carayon; Peter Hoonakker; Bat-Zion Hose; Benjamin Eithun; Thomas Brazelton; Joshua Ross; Jonathan E Kohler; Michelle M Kelly; Shannon M Dean; Deborah Rusy; Ayse P Gurses Journal: Appl Ergon Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Meghan B Lane-Fall; Rinad S Beidas; Jose L Pascual; Meredith L Collard; Hannah G Peifer; Tyler J Chavez; Mark E Barry; Jacob T Gutsche; Scott D Halpern; Lee A Fleisher; Frances K Barg Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 2.102