Literature DB >> 20974335

Clinical and biomechanical analyses to select a suture material for uvulopalatopharyngeal surgery.

Tsung-Wei Huang1, Po-Wen Cheng, Yen-Hui Chan, Chi-Te Wang, Kai-Min Fang, Tai-Horng Young.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The selection of the degradation pattern of suture materials is critical in uvulopalatopharyngeal surgery because of the complex oral environment such as the constant presence of saliva; the microbial accumulation; and the functions related to speech, mastication, and swallowing. The aim of the study was to identify appropriate suture materials for uvulopalatopharyngeal surgery by analyzing the clinical and biomechanical results obtained using four different absorbable suture materials. STUDY
DESIGN: A randomized open-label trial.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome who had undergone microdebrider-assisted extended uvulopalatoplasty were randomized into the four suture groups: sutures of polyglycolide (Dexon) and copolymers of polyglycolide and other degradable polymers (Polysorb, Monocryl, Maxon). Handling characteristics, surgical outcomes, Young's modulus reduction, morphologic changes by scanning electron microscope, and saliva absorption test were analyzed.
RESULTS: Monocryl (poly(glycolide-co-ε-caprolactone)) had the optimal handling characteristics and exhibited two-stage degradation: sufficient tensile strength was maintained initially to allow wound healing, and then the suture degraded rapidly to avoid irritation. In contrast, the hydrolytic degradation of Dexon, Polysorb, and Maxon seemed to involve only an approximately single-stage process in the oral environment. Moreover, a large amount of debris was observed among filaments in Dexon and Polysorb, whereas only some scattered debris accumulated on Monocryl and Maxon under scanning electron microscope.
CONCLUSION: Poly(glycolide-co-ε-caprolactone) has good handling characteristics and degrades in two stages. It is a suitable suture material for uvulopalatopharyngeal surgery.
Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20974335     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.06.919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  5 in total

1.  [S2e-guideline: "ENT-specific therapy of obstructive sleep apnea in adults" short version : Sleep Medicine Task Force of the German Society for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].

Authors:  T Verse; A Dreher; C Heiser; M Herzog; J T Maurer; W Pirsig; K Rohde; N Rothmeier; A Sauter; A Steffen; S Wenzel; B A Stuck
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  ENT-specific therapy of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults : A revised version of the previously published German S2e guideline.

Authors:  T Verse; A Dreher; C Heiser; M Herzog; J T Maurer; W Pirsig; K Rohde; N Rothmeier; A Sauter; A Steffen; S Wenzel; B A Stuck
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Comparison of Artificial Saliva vs Saline Solution on Rate of Suture Degradation in Oropharyngeal Surgery.

Authors:  Jenna W Briddell; Luke E Riexinger; Jove Graham; Donna M Ebenstein
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Evaluation of tensile strength of surgical synthetic absorbable suture materials: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sujeet Vinayak Khiste; V Ranganath; Ashish Sham Nichani
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Antibacterial suture vs silk for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. A randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Sergi Sala-Pérez; Marta López-Ramírez; Milva Quinteros-Borgarello; Eduardo Valmaseda-Castellón; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-01-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.