Literature DB >> 20973766

Assessing peristomal skin changes in ostomy patients: validation of the Ostomy Skin Tool.

G B Jemec1, L Martins, I Claessens, E A Ayello, A S Hansen, L H Poulsen, R G Sibbald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peristomal skin problems are common and are treated by a variety of health professionals. Clear and consistent communication among these professionals is therefore particularly important. The Ostomy Skin Tool (OST) is a new assessment instrument for the extent and severity of peristomal skin conditions. Formal tests of reliability and validity are necessary for its use in clinical practice, research, and education.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate inter- and intra nurse assessment variability of the OST and validity by comparison to a 'gold standard' (GS) defined by an expert panel.
METHODS: Thirty photographs of peristomal skin were presented twice to 20 ostomy care nurses--10 from Denmark (DK) and 10 from Spain (ES)--to determine intra- and inter nurse assessment variability. The same photographs were presented to an international group of experts (dermatologist and ostomy care nurses), to establish a GS for comparison and validation of the results.
RESULTS: A high intra-nurse assessment agreement, κ=0·84, was found with no differences in the intra-nurse assessments from the two groups of nurses (DK and ES). The inter-nurse assessment agreement was 'moderate to good', κ=0·54, with the agreement between the experts higher, κ=0·70. A high correlation between the scores from the nurses and the GS were seen in the lower part of the two scales [Discoloration, Erosion, Tissue overgrowth (DET) score<7)].
CONCLUSION: The study supported the validity of the OST. It is suggested that a categorical scale can be used to illustrate the severity of the DET scores.
© 2011 The Authors. BJD © 2011 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20973766     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10093.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  9 in total

1.  [LSD score. A new classification system for peristomal skin lesions].

Authors:  N Runkel; W Droste; B Reith; E C Jehle; S Benz; M Birk; G Staib; J Romankiewicz; F Hartkopf; M Jooß
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Risk factors for the incidence and severity of peristomal skin disorders defined using two scoring systems.

Authors:  Takuya Shiraishi; Yuji Nishizawa; Mifumi Nakajima; Ryoko Kado; Koji Ikeda; Yuichiro Tsukada; Takeshi Sasaki; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Design and validation of a "Peristomal Lesion Scale" for peristomal skin assessment.

Authors:  Giulia Menin; Gabriele Roveron; Maria Barbierato; Angela Peghetti; Renzo Zanotti
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Safety and Feasibility of Umbilical Diverting Loop Ileostomy for Patients with Rectal Tumor.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyo; Ichiro Takemasa; Taishi Hata; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Peristomal skin complications are common, expensive, and difficult to manage: a population based cost modeling study.

Authors:  Søren Meisner; Paul-Antoine Lehur; Brendan Moran; Lina Martins; Gregor Borut Ernst Jemec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Determining Variances in Ostomy Skin Conditions and the Economic Impact (ADVOCATE Trial).

Authors:  Janice C Colwell; Joyce Pittman; Rose Raizman; Ginger Salvadalena
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.741

7.  Randomized clinical trial of intracutaneously versus transcutaneously sutured ileostomy to prevent stoma-related complications (ISI trial).

Authors:  M F Sier; D D Wisselink; D T Ubbink; R J Oostenbroek; G J Veldink; B Lamme; P van Duijvendijk; A A W van Geloven; Q A J Eijsbouts; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Risk factors for parastomal hernia of loop stoma and relationships with other stoma complications in laparoscopic surgery era.

Authors:  Takuya Shiraishi; Yuji Nishizawa; Koji Ikeda; Yuichiro Tsukada; Takeshi Sasaki; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Automated Assessment of Peristomal Skin Discoloration and Leakage Area Using Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Niels K Andersen; Pernille Trøjgaard; Nana O Herschend; Zenia M Størling
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2020-09-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.