Literature DB >> 20972656

Switching epoetin alfa and epoetin zeta in patients with renal anemia on dialysis: Posthoc analysis.

Andrzej Więcek1, Islah Ahmed, Paul Scigalla, Rossen Koytchev.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: epoetin zeta is a recently introduced recombinant erythropoietin, designed to be biologically similar to epoetin alfa. This posthoc analysis evaluated the impact of switching patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on hemodialysis from epoetin alfa to epoetin zeta, or vice versa, on hemoglobin concentration, epoetin dose, and patient safety.
METHODS: data were analyzed from three published trials: two 24-week randomized, double-blind (maintenance and induction) studies and a 56-week, open-label, follow-on study involving adult patients with CKD stage 5, maintained on hemodialysis, and receiving epoetin alfa or epoetin zeta. Patients had either completed and switched treatments within the maintenance study, or had completed the induction or maintenance study on epoetin alfa and then switched to, and completed at least 12 weeks of follow-up treatment on, epoetin zeta. Mean hemoglobin levels and epoetin dose were evaluated pre- (0-4 weeks before) and post- (8-12 weeks after) switch, and were considered equivalent for the two treatments if the upper and lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the intraindividual differences in mean values fell within accepted limits.
RESULTS: overall, 481 patients were included in the analysis. Mean hemoglobin concentration was maintained at target levels (10.5-12.5 g/dL) throughout the drug switch. The mean differences in hemoglobin concentration and associated 95% CIs following the switch remained within prespecified equivalence limits (± 1.0 g/dL). The 95% CIs of the mean difference in weekly epoetin dose postswitch also remained within prespecified equivalence margins (± 45 IU/kg; upper limit 17.83 IU/kg, lower limit -10.91 IU/kg). Both treatments were similarly well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: our data suggest that epoetin alfa and epoetin zeta therapy can be interchanged without any clinically significant alteration in efficacy, safety, or epoetin dose, in patients with CKD on dialysis receiving stable epoetin maintenance therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20972656     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-010-0080-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  14 in total

1.  Key concepts and critical issues on epoetin and filgrastim biosimilars. A position paper from the Italian Society of Hematology, Italian Society of Experimental Hematology, and Italian Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  Giovanni Barosi; Alberto Bosi; Maria P Abbracchio; Romano Danesi; Armando Genazzani; Paolo Corradini; Fabrizio Pane; Sante Tura
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Biosimilars Are Here: A Hospital Pharmacist's Guide to Educating Health Care Professionals on Biosimilars.

Authors:  Steven Jarrett; Theodor Dingermann
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015-11-19

Review 3.  Safety of Biologics, Including Biosimilars: Perspectives on Current Status and Future Direction.

Authors:  Ylenia Ingrasciotta; Paola M Cutroneo; Ilaria Marcianò; Thijs Giezen; Fabiola Atzeni; Gianluca Trifirò
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  A population-based study comparing biosimilar versus originator erythropoiesis-stimulating agent consumption in 6,117 patients with renal anaemia.

Authors:  Franziska Hörbrand; Peter Bramlage; Johann Fischaleck; Joerg Hasford; Reinhard Brunkhorst
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  The approval process for biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Authors:  Jay B Wish
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Comparative risk/benefit profile of biosimilar and originator erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs): data from an Italian observational study in nephrology.

Authors:  Domenico Motola; Alberto Vaccheri; Andrea Roncadori; Monia Donati; Giulia Bonaldo; Anna Covezzoli; Piera Polidori; Stefano Bianchi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and the risk of developing anti-drug antibodies-a systematic review.

Authors:  Marianne Heibert Arnlind; Linda Fryklund; Sigurd Vitols; Göran Bertilsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  How Much Are Biosimilars Used in Clinical Practice? A Retrospective Italian Population-Based Study of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in the Years 2009-2013.

Authors:  Ylenia Ingrasciotta; Francesco Giorgianni; Jenny Bolcato; Alessandro Chinellato; Roberta Pirolo; Daniele Ugo Tari; Chiara Troncone; Andrea Fontana; Valentina Ientile; Rosa Gini; Domenico Santoro; Mariacarmela Santarpia; Armando Genazzani; Ilaria Uomo; Maurizio Pastorello; Walter Sebastiano Pollina Addario; Salvatore Scondotto; Pasquale Cananzi; Achille Patrizio Caputi; Gianluca Trifirò
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 9.  Epoetin zeta in the management of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease, differential pharmacology and clinical utility.

Authors:  Mary Lynn Davis-Ajami; Jun Wu; Katherine Downton; Emilie Ludeman; Virginia Noxon
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2014-04-16

10.  Efficacy and safety data of subsequent entry biologics pertinent to nephrology practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Judith Genevieve Marin; Marianna Leung; Clifford Lo; Nicole W Tsao; Daniel J Martinusen
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2014-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.