Literature DB >> 20971840

Mammographic breast density: effect on imaging and breast cancer risk.

Renee W Pinsky1, Mark A Helvie.   

Abstract

Mammographic breast density has been studied for more than 30 years. Greater breast density not only is related to decreased sensitivity of mammograms because of a masking effect but also is a major independent risk factor for breast cancer. This article defines breast density and reviews literature on quantification of mammographic density that is key to future clinical and research protocols. Important influences on breast density are addressed, including age, menopausal status, exogenous hormones, and genetics of density. Young women with dense breasts benefit from digital mammographic technique. The potential use of supplemental MRI and ultrasound screening techniques in high-risk women and women with dense breasts is explored, as are potential risk reduction strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20971840     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  18 in total

1.  Prediction of breast cancer using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Ismail Saritas
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Quantra™ should be considered a tool for two-grade scale mammographic breast density classification.

Authors:  Ernest U Ekpo; Mark F McEntee; Mary Rickard; Patrick C Brennan; Jyotsna Kunduri; Delgermaa Demchig; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Detection of microcalcifications by characteristic magnetic susceptibility effects using MR phase image cross-correlation analysis.

Authors:  Richard A Baheza; E Brian Welch; Daniel F Gochberg; Melinda Sanders; Sara Harvey; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Current status of AYA-generation breast cancer: trends worldwide and in Japan.

Authors:  Manabu Futamura; Kazuhiro Yoshida
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Volumetric tri-modal imaging with combined photoacoustic, ultrasound, and shear wave elastography.

Authors:  Emily Zheng; Huijuan Zhang; Wentao Hu; Marvin M Doyley; Jun Xia
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  The implications of breast cancer molecular phenotype for radiation oncology.

Authors:  Shirin Sioshansi; Kathryn E Huber; David E Wazer
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Rikke Rass Winkel; My von Euler-Chelpin; Mads Nielsen; Pengfei Diao; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Wei Yao Uldall; Ilse Vejborg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Aromatase inhibitor-induced modulation of breast density: clinical and genetic effects.

Authors:  N L Henry; H-P Chan; J Dantzer; C P Goswami; L Li; T C Skaar; J M Rae; Z Desta; N Khouri; R Pinsky; S Oesterreich; C Zhou; L Hadjiiski; S Philips; J Robarge; A T Nguyen; A M Storniolo; D A Flockhart; D F Hayes; M A Helvie; V Stearns
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The tissue selective estrogen complex: a promising new menopausal therapy.

Authors:  Barry S Komm; Sebastian Mirkin
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-04

10.  Positive predictive value of additional synchronous breast lesions in whole-breast ultrasonography at the diagnosis of breast cancer: clinical and imaging factors.

Authors:  Ah Hyun Kim; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Byeong-Woo Park; Hee Jung Moon
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2014-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.