Literature DB >> 20970373

Drug susceptibility of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-derived pseudoviruses from treatment-experienced patients to protease inhibitors and reverse transcriptase inhibitors, using a modified single-round assay.

Ju-yeon Choi1, Oh-Kyung Kwon, Seon Young Choi, Yong Keun Park, Sung Soon Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genotypic drug resistance assay has been the only method available to provide information related to drug resistance in South Korea since 1999. Phenotypic assay is also a useful method to predict a patient's state related to antiretroviral drug resistance. However, commercial systems and methods for phenotyping have not been introduced into South Korea.
OBJECTIVES: To establish and apply modified phenotypic drug susceptibility assay using treatment-experienced patients' derived HIV-1 in South Korea. STUDY
DESIGN: The genotypic drug resistance and phenotypic drug susceptibility of two different methods, Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database (Stanford DB) and modified phenotypic drug susceptibility assay were compared especially focused on the HIV-1 protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) sequences.
RESULTS: There was some discordance in comparing drug susceptibility results (a modified drug susceptibility assay) with the predicted genotypic drug resistance (Stanford DB). Phenotypic drug resistance showed the following order for pseudoviruses from treatment-experienced patients infected with HIV/AIDS: Efavirenz (EFV, 21 to 1,319-fold change), Lamivudine (3TC, 31 to >189-fold change), Indinavir sulfate (IDV, 26 to 63-fold change), Amprenavir (APV, 4 to 35-fold change) and Zidovudine (AZT, 20 to 634-fold change). For patient KRC3221, the AZT-related phenotypic drug resistance was the greatest, with 634-fold change compared with the wild type.
CONCLUSIONS: Application of this modified phenotypic drug susceptibility assay is expected to help in predicting drug resistance as a guideline for clinicians to obtain a combined interpretation among genotyping, phenotyping and effective clinical treatments.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20970373     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


  4 in total

1.  Indinavir resistance evolution: a comment.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Virol Sin       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 4.327

2.  Novel method for simultaneous quantification of phenotypic resistance to maturation, protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase HIV inhibitors based on 3'Gag(p2/p7/p1/p6)/PR/RT/INT-recombinant viruses: a useful tool in the multitarget era of antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Jan Weber; Ana C Vazquez; Dane Winner; Justine D Rose; Doug Wylie; Ariel M Rhea; Kenneth Henry; Jennifer Pappas; Alison Wright; Nizar Mohamed; Richard Gibson; Benigno Rodriguez; Vicente Soriano; Kevin King; Eric J Arts; Paul D Olivo; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Novel two-round phenotypic assay for protease inhibitor susceptibility testing of recombinant and primary HIV-1 isolates.

Authors:  Maria C Puertas; Maria J Buzón; Mònica Ballestero; Peter Van Den Eede; Bonaventura Clotet; Julia G Prado; Javier Martinez-Picado
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Drug susceptibility to etravirine and darunavir among Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-derived pseudoviruses in treatment-experienced patients with HIV/AIDS in South Korea.

Authors:  Oh-Kyung Kwon; Sung Soon Kim; Jee Eun Rhee; Mee-Kyung Kee; Mina Park; Hye-Ri Oh; Ju-Yeon Choi
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.099

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.