Literature DB >> 20968383

Relative contribution to speech intelligibility of different envelope modulation rates within the speech dynamic range.

Michael A Stone1, Christian Füllgrabe, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

The contribution of envelope cues at different rates to intelligibility in a competing-speech task was measured as a function of the short-term envelope level. The target and background mixture was processed using tone vocoders. Envelope signals for each vocoder channel were simultaneously extracted with two low-pass filters, the cutoff frequency of one filter (L) being two octaves below that of the other (H). The envelope from the H filter was used at the peaks and that from the L filter at valleys, or vice versa. This was achieved by cross-fading between the two envelope signals based on a "switching threshold" that was parametrically varied relative to the long-term RMS level of the channel signal. When the cutoff frequencies of the H and L filters were 50 and 12.5 Hz, changes in speech intelligibility occurred mainly when the switching threshold was between -18 and +10 dB. The range was slightly narrower when the cutoff frequencies of the H and L filters were 200 and 50 Hz. Intensity-importance functions for higher-rate envelope modulations suggested that levels ranging from 20 dB below to about 10 dB above the channel RMS level were important, with maximum importance for levels around -5 dB.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20968383     DOI: 10.1121/1.3479546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

Review 1.  Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: a behavioral and neural perspective.

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  The search for correlates of age-related cochlear synaptopathy: Measures of temporal envelope processing and spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Chhayakanta Patro; Heather A Kreft; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.672

5.  Does training with amplitude modulated tones affect tone-vocoded speech perception?

Authors:  Aina Casaponsa; Ediz Sohoglu; David R Moore; Christian Füllgrabe; Katharine Molloy; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Neural Generators Underlying Temporal Envelope Processing Show Altered Responses and Hemispheric Asymmetry Across Age.

Authors:  Ehsan Darestani Farahani; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Florian Langner; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Stimulus-evoked phase-locked activity along the human auditory pathway strongly varies across individuals.

Authors:  Robin Gransier; Michael Hofmann; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jessica J M Monaghan; Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.