Literature DB >> 20968367

Subjective scaling of spatial room acoustic parameters influenced by visual environmental cues.

Daniel L Valente1, Jonas Braasch.   

Abstract

Although there have been numerous studies investigating subjective spatial impression in rooms, only a few of those studies have addressed the influence of visual cues on the judgment of auditory measures. In the psychophysical study presented here, video footage of five solo music/speech performers was shown for four different listening positions within a general-purpose space. The videos were presented in addition to the acoustic signals, which were auralized using binaural room impulse responses (BRIR) that were recorded in the same general-purpose space. The participants were asked to adjust the direct-to-reverberant energy ratio (D/R ratio) of the BRIR according to their expectation considering the visual cues. They were also directed to rate the apparent source width (ASW) and listener envelopment (LEV) for each condition. Visual cues generated by changing the sound-source position in the multi-purpose space, as well as the makeup of the sound stimuli affected the judgment of spatial impression. Participants also scaled the direct-to-reverberant energy ratio with greater direct sound energy than was measured in the acoustical environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20968367      PMCID: PMC2981112          DOI: 10.1121/1.3478797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Direct-to-reverberant energy ratio sensitivity.

Authors:  Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  On the minimum audible difference in direct-to-reverberant energy ratio.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; Nandini Iyer; Charissa R Lansing; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood.

Authors:  M G Kenward; J H Roger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Further study of existence regions for the "ventriloquism effect".

Authors:  W R Thurlow; T M Rosenthal
Journal:  J Am Audiol Soc       Date:  1976 May-Jun

6.  Auditory spaciousness: some further psychoacoustic analyses.

Authors:  J Blauert; W Lindemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Certain determinants of the "ventriloquism effect".

Authors:  W R Thurlow; C E Jack
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1973-06

8.  Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance.

Authors:  P Bertelson; M Radeau
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-06

9.  The effect of visual and auditory cues on seat preference in an opera theater.

Authors:  Jin Yong Jeon; Yong Hee Kim; Densil Cabrera; John Bassett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparing perceived auditory width to the visual image of a performing ensemble in contrasting bi-modal environments.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Jonas Braasch; Shane A Myrbeck
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.