PURPOSE: α-Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), β-HCH, and lindane (γ-HCH) were listed as persistent organic pollutants by the Stockholm Convention in 2009 and hence must be phased out and their wastes/stockpiles eliminated. At the last operating lindane manufacturing unit, we conducted a preliminary evaluation of HCH contamination levels in soil and water samples collected around the production area and the vicinity of a major dumpsite to inform the design of processes for an appropriate implementation of the Convention. METHODS: Soil and water samples on and around the production site and a major waste dumpsite were measured for HCH levels. RESULTS: All soil samples taken at the lindane production facility and dumpsite and in their vicinity were contaminated with an isomer pattern characteristic of HCH production waste. At the dumpsite surface samples contained up to 450 g kg(-1) Σ HCH suggesting that the waste HCH isomers were simply dumped at this location. Ground water in the vicinity and river water was found to be contaminated with 0.2 to 0.4 mg l(-1) of HCH waste isomers. The total quantity of deposited HCH wastes from the lindane production unit was estimated at between 36,000 and 54,000 t. CONCLUSIONS: The contamination levels in ground and river water suggest significant run-off from the dumped HCH wastes and contamination of drinking water resources. The extent of dumping urgently needs to be assessed regarding the risks to human and ecosystem health. A plan for securing the waste isomers needs to be developed and implemented together with a plan for their final elimination. As part of the assessment, any polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDF) generated during HCH recycling operations need to be monitored.
PURPOSE: α-Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), β-HCH, and lindane (γ-HCH) were listed as persistent organic pollutants by the Stockholm Convention in 2009 and hence must be phased out and their wastes/stockpiles eliminated. At the last operating lindane manufacturing unit, we conducted a preliminary evaluation of HCH contamination levels in soil and water samples collected around the production area and the vicinity of a major dumpsite to inform the design of processes for an appropriate implementation of the Convention. METHODS: Soil and water samples on and around the production site and a major waste dumpsite were measured for HCH levels. RESULTS: All soil samples taken at the lindane production facility and dumpsite and in their vicinity were contaminated with an isomer pattern characteristic of HCH production waste. At the dumpsite surface samples contained up to 450 g kg(-1) Σ HCH suggesting that the waste HCH isomers were simply dumped at this location. Ground water in the vicinity and river water was found to be contaminated with 0.2 to 0.4 mg l(-1) of HCH waste isomers. The total quantity of deposited HCH wastes from the lindane production unit was estimated at between 36,000 and 54,000 t. CONCLUSIONS: The contamination levels in ground and river water suggest significant run-off from the dumped HCH wastes and contamination of drinking water resources. The extent of dumping urgently needs to be assessed regarding the risks to human and ecosystem health. A plan for securing the waste isomers needs to be developed and implemented together with a plan for their final elimination. As part of the assessment, any polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDF) generated during HCH recycling operations need to be monitored.
Authors: William W Mohn; Birgit Mertens; Josh D Neufeld; Willy Verstraete; Victor de Lorenzo Journal: Environ Microbiol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.491
Authors: Erika Andersson; Anna Rotander; Thomas von Kronhelm; Anna Berggren; Per Ivarsson; Henner Hollert; Magnus Engwall Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: M Dadhwal; A Singh; O Prakash; S K Gupta; K Kumari; P Sharma; S Jit; M Verma; C Holliger; R Lal Journal: J Appl Microbiol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.772
Authors: P C Abhilash; Sarah Jamil; Vandana Singh; Amita Singh; Nandita Singh; S C Srivastava Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2008-03-07 Impact factor: 7.086
Authors: A Dvorská; M Sír; Z Honzajková; J Komprda; P Cupr; J Petrlík; E Anakhasyan; L Simonyan; M Kubal Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2012-07-06 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Peter Wycisk; Reiner Stollberg; Christian Neumann; Wolfgang Gossel; Holger Weiss; Roland Weber Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Georgii Lysychenko; Roland Weber; Valeria Kovach; Modest Gertsiuk; Alan Watson; Iryna Krasnova Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Soňa Wimmerová; Alan Watson; Beata Drobná; Eva Šovčíková; Roland Weber; Kinga Lancz; Henrieta Patayová; Denisa Richterová; Vladimíra Koštiaková; Dana Jurečková; Pavol Závacký; Maximilián Strémy; Todd A Jusko; Ľubica Palkovičová Murínová; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Tomáš Trnovec Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 4.223