Literature DB >> 20966814

Outcome analysis in 93 facial rejuvenation patients treated with a deep-plane face lift.

Eric Swanson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This prospective study assessed outcomes in patients undergoing a deep-plane face lift and other simultaneous facial cosmetic procedures. It is the first prospective outcome study to assess and compare these patients and provide data on patient satisfaction and quality of life—the most important determinants of surgical success.
METHODS: From 2002 to 2007, in-person interviews were conducted with 93 patients who attended a follow-up appointment at least 1 month after surgery from a total of 122 consecutive patients treated with a deep-plane face lift and other facial rejuvenation procedures (response rate, 76 percent). Questions were asked in six categories: patient data, indications, recovery, results, complications, and psychological effects. Responses were analyzed in four groups: face lift alone; face lift and blepharoplasties; face lift and forehead lift; and face lift, blepharoplasties, and endoscopic forehead lift.
RESULTS: The average subjective reduction in apparent age was 11.9 years (range, 0 to 27.5 years). Seventy-seven patients (82.8 percent) reported an improvement in self-esteem, and 64 patients (69.6 percent) reported an improved quality of life. There was no significant correlation between result rating and procedure groups, age, gender, smoking history, previous face lift, body mass index, or the occurrence of a complication.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant recovery period, patient satisfaction was high, with 96.7 percent of patients reporting a more youthful appearance after surgery. Scar dissatisfaction was rare (2.2 percent). With proper patient preparation and education, facial rejuvenation effectively meets patient expectations. These findings support the recommendation of surgical facial rejuvenation to patients who wish to look younger.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20966814     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed81f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Nanofat Injection for the Treatment of Depressed Facial Scars.

Authors:  Rong Huang; Hu Jiao; Jincai Fan; Liqiang Liu; Jia Tian; Cheng Gan; Zengjie Yang; Tiran Zhang; Yan Zeng; Zhiguo Su
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Outcome studies in plastic surgery: knowing the objectives and avoiding pitfalls.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-01-08

3.  Presto lift-a facelift that preserves the retaining ligaments and SMAS tethering.

Authors:  Wolfgang Funk
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-12-02

4.  Clinical Evaluation of 225 Sub-SMAS Facelifts with No Temporal Incision.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-26

5.  A Systematic Review of Subsurface Radiofrequency Treatments in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  Facelift Surgery after Permanent Filler: Outcomes after Removal of Permanent Filler under Local Anesthesia.

Authors:  Ahmad A F Alaslawi; Ahmed M Zeina; Tarek Zahra
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-08-22

7.  Evaluation of Face Lift Skin Perfusion and Epinephrine Effect Using Laser Fluorescence Imaging.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.