Literature DB >> 20966043

Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.

Sunita J Shukla1, Srilatha Sakamuru, Ruili Huang, Timothy A Moeller, Paul Shinn, Danielle Vanleer, Douglas S Auld, Christopher P Austin, Menghang Xia.   

Abstract

The pregnane X receptor (PXR) binds xenobiotics and regulates the expression of several drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. Human PXR (hPXR) activation and CYP3A4 induction can be involved in drug-drug interactions, resulting in reduced efficacy or increased toxicity. However, there are known species-specific differences with regard to PXR activation that should be taken into account when animal PXR data are extrapolated to humans. We profiled 2816 clinically used drugs from the National Institutes of Health Chemical Genomics Center Pharmaceutical Collection for their ability to activate hPXR and rat PXR (rPXR) at the cellular level, induce human CYP3A4 at the cellular level, and bind human PXR at the protein level. From 6 to 11% of drugs were identified as active across the four assays, which included assay-specific and pan-active compounds. The lowest concordance was observed between the hPXR and rPXR assays, and many compounds active in both assays nonetheless demonstrated significant potency differences between species. Analysis based on clustering potency values demonstrated the greatest activity correlation between the hPXR activation and CYP3A4 induction assays. Structure-activity relationship analysis identified chemical scaffolds that were pan-active (e.g., dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) and others that were uniquely active in individual assays (e.g., steroids and fatty acids). These results provide important information on PXR activation by clinically used drugs, highlight the species specificity of PXR activation by xenobiotics, and provide a means of prioritizing compounds for follow-up studies and optimization efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20966043      PMCID: PMC3014269          DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.035105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  40 in total

1.  Humanized xenobiotic response in mice expressing nuclear receptor SXR.

Authors:  W Xie; J L Barwick; M Downes; B Blumberg; C M Simon; M C Nelson; B A Neuschwander-Tetri; E M Brunt; P S Guzelian; R M Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Evaluation of 170 xenobiotics as transactivators of human pregnane X receptor (hPXR) and correlation to known CYP3A4 drug interactions.

Authors:  Michael Sinz; Sean Kim; Zhengrong Zhu; Taosheng Chen; Monique Anthony; Kenneth Dickinson; A David Rodrigues
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 3.  PXR and CAR: nuclear receptors which play a pivotal role in drug disposition and chemical toxicity.

Authors:  Lesley A Stanley; Brian C Horsburgh; Jillian Ross; Nico Scheer; C Roland Wolf
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.518

4.  Anti-inflammatory and anti-itch activity of sertaconazole nitrate.

Authors:  Frank Liebel; Peter Lyte; Michelle Garay; Jeffrey Babad; Michael D Southall
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.017

5.  Rimexolone 1% versus prednisolone acetate in preventing early postoperative inflammation after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Sevim Kavuncu; Hasan Horoz; Aylin Ardagil; Hasan H Erbil
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Self-association of the anionic form of the DNA-binding anticancer drug mithramycin.

Authors:  Shibojyoti Lahiri; Pukhrambam Grihanjali Devi; Parijat Majumder; Suman Das; Dipak Dasgupta
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 7.  CAR and PXR: the xenobiotic-sensing receptors.

Authors:  Yoav E Timsit; Masahiko Negishi
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 8.  The role of nuclear receptors in pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions in oncology.

Authors:  S Harmsen; I Meijerman; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 12.111

9.  Species-specific activation of nuclear receptors correlates with the response of liver drug metabolizing enzymes to EMD 392949 in vitro.

Authors:  Stefan O Mueller; Yvonne Fery; Gregor Tuschl; Dieter Schrenk
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.372

10.  Evolution of pharmacologic specificity in the pregnane X receptor.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Erica J Reschly; Lee R Hagey; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  36 in total

1.  Quantitative high-throughput drug screening identifies novel classes of drugs with anticancer activity in thyroid cancer cells: opportunities for repurposing.

Authors:  Lisa Zhang; Mei He; Yaqin Zhang; Naris Nilubol; Min Shen; Electron Kebebew
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  A concentration addition model to assess activation of the pregnane X receptor (PXR) by pesticide mixtures found in the French diet.

Authors:  Georges de Sousa; Ahmad Nawaz; Jean-Pierre Cravedi; Roger Rahmani
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Ligand binding at the protein-lipid interface: strategic considerations for drug design.

Authors:  Jian Payandeh; Matthew Volgraf
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Identifying environmental chemicals as agonists of the androgen receptor by using a quantitative high-throughput screening platform.

Authors:  Caitlin Lynch; Srilatha Sakamuru; Ruili Huang; Diana A Stavreva; Lyuba Varticovski; Gordon L Hager; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Warren Casey; Richard S Paules; Anton Simeonov; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 5.  100 Years of Suramin.

Authors:  Natalie Wiedemar; Dennis A Hauser; Pascal Mäser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Probing Ligand Structure-Activity Relationships in Pregnane X Receptor (PXR): Efavirenz and 8-Hydroxyefavirenz Exhibit Divergence in Activation.

Authors:  Bhargavi Narayanan; Julie M Lade; Carley J S Heck; Kevin D Dietz; Herschel Wade; Namandjé N Bumpus
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Phase 0 of the Xenobiotic Response: Nuclear Receptors and Other Transcription Factors as a First Step in Protection from Xenobiotics.

Authors:  William S Baldwin
Journal:  Nucl Receptor Res       Date:  2019-11-20

8.  Pregnane X Receptor Activation Attenuates Inflammation-Associated Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction by Inhibiting Cytokine-Induced Myosin Light-Chain Kinase Expression and c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase 1/2 Activation.

Authors:  Aditya Garg; Angela Zhao; Sarah L Erickson; Subhajit Mukherjee; Aik Jiang Lau; Laurie Alston; Thomas K H Chang; Sridhar Mani; Simon A Hirota
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 9.  The pregnane X receptor in tuberculosis therapeutics.

Authors:  Amina I Shehu; Guangming Li; Wen Xie; Xiaochao Ma
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 10.  PXR antagonists and implication in drug metabolism.

Authors:  Sridhar Mani; Wei Dou; Matthew R Redinbo
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.518

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.