Literature DB >> 20965361

Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.

J E Pryce1, M E Goddard, H W Raadsma, B J Hayes.   

Abstract

A deterministic model to calculate rates of genetic gain and inbreeding was used to compare a range of breeding scheme designs under genomic selection (GS) for a population of 140,000 cows. For most schemes it was assumed that the reliability of genomic breeding values (GEBV) was 0.6 across 4 pathways of selection. In addition, the effect of varying reliability on the ranking of schemes was also investigated. The schemes considered included intense selection in male pathways and genotyping of 1,000 young bulls (GS-Y). This scheme was extended to include selection in females and to include a "worldwide" scheme similar to GS-Y, but 6 times as large and assuming genotypes were freely exchanged between 6 countries. An additional worldwide scheme was modeled where GEBV were available through international genetic evaluations without exchange of genotypes. Finally, a closed nucleus herd that used juvenile in vitro embryo transfer in heifers was modeled so that the generation interval in female pathways was reduced to 1 or 2 yr. When the breeding schemes were compared using a GEBV reliability of 0.6, the rates of genetic gain were between 59 and 130% greater than the rate of genetic gain achieved in progeny testing. This was mainly through reducing the generation interval and increasing selection intensity. Genomic selection of females resulted in a 50% higher rate of genetic gain compared with restricting GS to young bulls only. The annual rates of inbreeding were, in general, 60% lower than with progeny testing, because more sires of bulls and sires of cows were selected, thus increasing the effective population size. The exception was in nucleus breeding schemes that had very short generation intervals, resulting in higher rates of both gain and inbreeding. It is likely that breeding companies will move rapidly to alter their breeding schemes to make use of genomic selection because benefits to the breeding companies and to the industry are considerable.
Copyright © 2010 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20965361     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  10 in total

1.  Genetic variances of SNP loci for milk yield in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Petr Pešek; Josef Přibyl; Luboš Vostrý
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection.

Authors:  Adriana García-Ruiz; John B Cole; Paul M VanRaden; George R Wiggans; Felipe J Ruiz-López; Curtis P Van Tassell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Design of a bovine low-density SNP array optimized for imputation.

Authors:  Didier Boichard; Hoyoung Chung; Romain Dassonneville; Xavier David; André Eggen; Sébastien Fritz; Kimberly J Gietzen; Ben J Hayes; Cynthia T Lawley; Tad S Sonstegard; Curtis P Van Tassell; Paul M VanRaden; Karine A Viaud-Martinez; George R Wiggans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Increased genetic gains in sheep, beef and dairy breeding programs from using female reproductive technologies combined with optimal contribution selection and genomic breeding values.

Authors:  Tom Granleese; Samuel A Clark; Andrew A Swan; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  An analytical framework to derive the expected precision of genomic selection.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Elsen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Genetic and economic benefits of foreign sire contributions to a domestic sheep industry; including an Ireland-New Zealand case study.

Authors:  Nicola Fetherstone; Fiona S Hely; Noirín McHugh; Fiona M McGovern; Peter R Amer
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS): a novel, efficient and cost-effective genotyping method for cattle using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Marcos De Donato; Sunday O Peters; Sharon E Mitchell; Tanveer Hussain; Ikhide G Imumorin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Mehar S Khatkar; Gerhard Moser; Ben J Hayes; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Approximated prediction of genomic selection accuracy when reference and candidate populations are related.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Elsen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Simulation studies to optimize genomic selection in honey bees.

Authors:  Richard Bernstein; Manuel Du; Andreas Hoppe; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.297

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.