Literature DB >> 20965072

Signaling in induced resistance.

John P Carr1, Mathew G Lewsey, Peter Palukaitis.   

Abstract

Induced mechanisms are by definition imperceptible or less active in uninfected, unstressed, or untreated plants, but can be activated by pathogen infection, stress, or chemical treatment to inhibit the replication and movement of virus in the host. In contrast, defenses that are pre-existing or serve to limit virus propagation and spread in otherwise susceptible hosts are considered to be "basal" in nature. Both forms of resistance can be genetically determined. Most recessive resistance genes that control resistance to viruses appear not to depend upon inducible mechanisms but rather maintain basal resistance by producing nonfunctional variants of factors, specifically translation initiation factors, required by the virus for successful exploitation of the host cell protein synthetic machinery. In contrast, most dominant resistance genes condition the induction of broad-scale changes in plant biochemistry and physiology that are activated and regulated by various signal transduction pathways, particularly those regulated by salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene. These induced changes include localized plant cell death (associated with the hypersensitive response, HR) and the upregulation of resistance against many types of pathogen throughout the plant (systemic acquired resistance, SAR). Unfortunately, it is still poorly understood how virus infection is inhibited and restricted during the HR and in plants exhibiting SAR. Resistance to viruses is not always genetically predetermined and can be highly adaptive in nature. This is exemplified by resistance based on RNA silencing, which appears to play roles in both induced and basal resistance to viruses. To counter inducible resistance mechanisms, viruses have acquired counter-defense factors to subvert RNA silencing. Some of these factors may affect signal transduction pathways controlled by salicylic acid and jasmonic acid. In this chapter, we review current knowledge of defensive signaling in resistance to viruses including the nature and roles of low molecular weight, proteinaceous, and small RNA components of defensive signaling. We discuss the differences and similarities of defenses and defensive signaling directed against viral versus nonviral pathogens, the potential role of RNA silencing as an effector in resistance and possible regulator of defensive signaling, crosstalk and overlap between antiviral systems, and interference with and manipulation of host defensive systems by the viruses themselves.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20965072     DOI: 10.1016/S0065-3527(10)76003-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Virus Res        ISSN: 0065-3527            Impact factor:   9.937


  42 in total

1.  The use of ECAS in plant protection: a green and efficient antimicrobial approach that primes selected defense genes.

Authors:  Marco Zarattini; Morena De Bastiani; Giovanni Bernacchia; Sergio Ferro; Achille De Battisti
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Plant immune responses against viruses: how does a virus cause disease?

Authors:  Kranthi K Mandadi; Karen-Beth G Scholthof
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  RNA silencing components mediate resistance signaling against turnip crinkle virus.

Authors:  Shifeng Zhu; Gah-Hyun Lim; Keshun Yu; Rae-Dong Jeong; Aardra Kachroo; Pradeep Kachroo
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2014-03-10

4.  Disruption of Ethylene Responses by Turnip mosaic virus Mediates Suppression of Plant Defense against the Green Peach Aphid Vector.

Authors:  Clare L Casteel; Manori De Alwis; Aurélie Bak; Haili Dong; Steven A Whitham; Georg Jander
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Heterotrimeric G-proteins facilitate resistance to plant pathogenic viruses in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.

Authors:  Eric Brenya; Yuri Trusov; Ralf Georg Dietzgen; José Ramón Botella
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2016-08-02

6.  Characterization of a viral synergism in the monocot Brachypodium distachyon reveals distinctly altered host molecular processes associated with disease.

Authors:  Kranthi K Mandadi; Karen-Beth G Scholthof
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Temporal-spatial interaction between reactive oxygen species and abscisic acid regulates rapid systemic acclimation in plants.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Suzuki; Gad Miller; Carolina Salazar; Hossain A Mondal; Elena Shulaev; Diego F Cortes; Joel L Shuman; Xiaozhong Luo; Jyoti Shah; Karen Schlauch; Vladimir Shulaev; Ron Mittler
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Regulation of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 1 and isochorismate synthase gene expression in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Lydia J R Hunter; Jack H Westwood; Geraldine Heath; Keith Macaulay; Alison G Smith; Stuart A Macfarlane; Peter Palukaitis; John P Carr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  DNA binding specificity of ATAF2, a NAC domain transcription factor targeted for degradation by Tobacco mosaic virus.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; James N Culver
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 10.  Modulation of host plant immunity by Tobamovirus proteins.

Authors:  G Conti; M C Rodriguez; A L Venturuzzi; S Asurmendi
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.