Literature DB >> 20964757

Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.

Jinliang Wang1.   

Abstract

Genetic markers are widely used to determine the parentage of individuals in studies of mating systems, reproductive success, dispersals, quantitative genetic parameters and in the management of conservation populations. These markers are, however, imperfect for parentage analyses because of the presence of genotyping errors and undetectable alleles, which may cause incompatible genotypes (mismatches) between parents and offspring and thus result in false exclusions of true parentage. Highly polymorphic markers widely used in parentage analyses, such as microsatellites, are especially prone to genotyping errors. In this investigation, I derived the probabilities of excluding a random (related) individual from parentage and the probabilities of Mendelian-inconsistent errors (mismatches) and Mendelian-consistent errors (which do not cause mismatches) in parent-offspring dyads, when a marker having null alleles, allelic dropouts and false alleles is used in a parentage analysis. These probabilities are useful in evaluating the impact of various types of genotyping errors on the information content of a set of markers in and thus the power of a parentage analysis, in determining the threshold number of genetic mismatches that is appropriate for a parentage exclusion analysis and in estimating the rates of genotyping errors and frequencies of null alleles from observed mismatches between known parent-offspring dyads. These applications are demonstrated by numerical examples using both hypothetical and empirical data sets and discussed in the context of practical parentage exclusion analyses.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20964757     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04865.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  6 in total

1.  Microsatellite-based parentage analysis of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) using nonlethal DNA sampling.

Authors:  Jacklyn Wong; Yui Yin Chu; Steven T Stoddard; Yoosook Lee; Amy C Morrison; Thomas W Scott
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Early genetic consequences of defaunation in a large-seeded vertebrate-dispersed palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana).

Authors:  M I Giombini; S P Bravo; Y V Sica; D S Tosto
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Quantitative analysis of low-density SNP data for parentage assignment and estimation of family contributions to pooled samples.

Authors:  John M Henshall; Leanne Dierens; Melony J Sellars
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  High Interannual Variability in Connectivity and Genetic Pool of a Temperate Clingfish Matches Oceanographic Transport Predictions.

Authors:  Maria Klein; Sara Teixeira; Jorge Assis; Ester A Serrão; Emanuel J Gonçalves; Rita Borges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods.

Authors:  Emma L Carroll; Mike W Bruford; J Andrew DeWoody; Gregoire Leroy; Alan Strand; Lisette Waits; Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Mating systems, reproductive success, and sexual selection in secretive species: a case study of the western diamond-backed rattlesnake, Crotalus atrox.

Authors:  Rulon W Clark; Gordon W Schuett; Roger A Repp; Melissa Amarello; Charles F Smith; Hans-Werner Herrmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.