Literature DB >> 20964581

Delivery of plasmid DNA encoding bone morphogenetic protein-2 with a biodegradable branched polycationic polymer in a critical-size rat cranial defect model.

Sue Anne Chew1, James D Kretlow, Patrick P Spicer, Austin W Edwards, L Scott Baggett, Yasuhiko Tabata, F Kurtis Kasper, Antonios G Mikos.   

Abstract

This study investigated the delivery of plasmid DNA (pDNA) encoding bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the form of polyplexes with a biodegradable branched triacrylate/amine polycationic polymer (TAPP) that were complexed with gelatin microparticles (GMPs) loaded within a porous tissue engineering scaffold. More specifically, the study investigated the interplay between TAPP degradation, gelatin degradation, pDNA release, and bone formation in a critical-size rat cranial defect model. The pDNA release kinetics in vitro were not affected by the crosslinking density of the GMPs but depended, rather, on the degradation rates of the TAPPs. Besides the initial release of polyplexes not bound to the GMPs and the minimal release of polyplexes through diffusion or dissociation from the GMPs, the pDNA was likely released as naked pDNA or as part of an incomplete polyplex, after the degradation of fragments of the polycationic polymer. After 30 days, significantly higher amounts of pDNA were released (93%-98%) from composite scaffolds containing naked pDNA or pDNA complexed with P-AEPZ (synthesized with 1-[2-aminoethyl]piperazine, a faster degrading TAPP) compared with those containing pDNA complexed with P-DED (synthesized with N,N-dimethylethylenediamine, a slower degrading TAPP) (74%-82%). Composite scaffolds containing GMPs complexed with TAPP/pDNA polyplexes did not result in enhanced bone formation, as analyzed by microcomputed tomography and histology, in a critical-size rat cranial defect at 12 weeks postimplantation compared with those loaded with naked pDNA. The results demonstrate that polycationic polymers with a slow degradation rate can prolong the release of pDNA from the composite scaffolds and suggest that a gene delivery system comprising biodegradable polycationic polymers should be designed to release the pDNA in an intact polyplex form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20964581      PMCID: PMC3044067          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  35 in total

1.  Microencapsulation of DNA using poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide): stability issues and release characteristics.

Authors:  E Walter; K Moelling; J Pavlovic; H P Merkle
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  1999-09-20       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Key issues in non-viral gene delivery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  1998-10-05       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  The Association Between Antiepileptic Drugs and Bone Disease.

Authors:  Alison M. Pack
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.500

4.  Direct cutaneous gene delivery in a human genetic skin disease.

Authors:  K A Choate; P A Khavari
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  1997-09-20       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 5.  Bone morphogenetic proteins, bone marrow stromal cells, and mesenchymal stem cells. Maureen Owen revisited.

Authors:  A H Reddi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Neovascularization effect of biodegradable gelatin microspheres incorporating basic fibroblast growth factor.

Authors:  Y Tabata; S Hijikata; M Muniruzzaman; Y Ikada
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.517

7.  In vivo release of plasmid DNA from composites of oligo(poly(ethylene glycol)fumarate) and cationized gelatin microspheres.

Authors:  F Kurtis Kasper; Toshihiro Kushibiki; Yu Kimura; Antonios G Mikos; Yasuhiko Tabata
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Transforming growth factor-beta 1 release from oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) hydrogels in conditions that model the cartilage wound healing environment.

Authors:  Theresa A Holland; Joerg K V Tessmar; Yasuhiko Tabata; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  In vitro and in vivo release of vascular endothelial growth factor from gelatin microparticles and biodegradable composite scaffolds.

Authors:  Zarana S Patel; Hiroki Ueda; Masaya Yamamoto; Yasuhiko Tabata; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Potential role for gene therapy in the enhancement of fracture healing.

Authors:  C Niyibizi; A Baltzer; C Lattermann; M Oyama; J D Whalen; P D Robbins; C H Evans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  12 in total

1.  Osteochondral tissue regeneration through polymeric delivery of DNA encoding for the SOX trio and RUNX2.

Authors:  Clark J Needham; Sarita R Shah; Rebecca L Dahlin; Lucas A Kinard; Johnny Lam; Brendan M Watson; Steven Lu; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 2.  Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Cato T Laurencin; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Building bridges: leveraging interdisciplinary collaborations in the development of biomaterials to meet clinical needs.

Authors:  Eliza L S Fong; Brendan M Watson; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Evaluation of bone regeneration using the rat critical size calvarial defect.

Authors:  Patrick P Spicer; James D Kretlow; Simon Young; John A Jansen; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 5.  Gene delivery to bone.

Authors:  C H Evans
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 6.  Physical non-viral gene delivery methods for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Adam J Mellott; M Laird Forrest; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Biodegradable, phosphate-containing, dual-gelling macromers for cellular delivery in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Brendan M Watson; Tiffany N Vo; Alexander M Tatara; Sarita R Shah; David W Scott; Paul S Engel; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Sustained localized presentation of RNA interfering molecules from in situ forming hydrogels to guide stem cell osteogenic differentiation.

Authors:  Minh K Nguyen; Oju Jeon; Melissa D Krebs; Daniel Schapira; Eben Alsberg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  Non-viral gene delivery systems for tissue repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Pan Wu; Haojiao Chen; Ronghua Jin; Tingting Weng; Jon Kee Ho; Chuangang You; Liping Zhang; Xingang Wang; Chunmao Han
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 10.  Bone Regeneration Using Gene-Activated Matrices.

Authors:  Sheetal D'Mello; Keerthi Atluri; Sean M Geary; Liu Hong; Satheesh Elangovan; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.