Literature DB >> 20964171

Optimization in hyperthermia treatment planning: the impact of tissue perfusion uncertainty.

M de Greef1, H P Kok, D Correia, A Bel, J Crezee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hyperthermia treatment planning (HTP) potentially provides a valuable tool for monitoring and optimization of treatment. However, one of the major problems in HTP is that different sources of uncertainty degrade its reliability. Perfusion uncertainty is one of the largest uncertainties and hence there is an ongoing debate whether optimization should be limited to power-based strategies. In this study a systematic analysis is carried out addressing this question.
METHODS: The influence of perfusion uncertainty on optimization was analyzed for five patients with cervix uteri carcinoma heated with the AMC-8 70 MHz phased-array waveguide system. The effect of variations (up to +/- 50%) in both the muscle and tumor perfusion level was investigated. For every patient, reference solutions were calculated using constrained temperature-based optimization for 25 different and known perfusion distributions. Reference solutions were compared to those found by temperature-based optimization using standard perfusion values and four SAR-based optimization methods. The effect of heterogeneity was investigated by creating 5 x 100 perfusion distributions for different levels of local variation (+/- 25% and +/- 50%) and scale (1 and 2 cm). Here the performance of the temperature-based optimization method was compared to a SAR-based method that showed good performance in the previous analysis.
RESULTS: Solutions found with temperature-based optimization using a deviating perfusion distribution during optimization were found within 1.0 degrees C from the true optimum. For the SAR-based methods, deviations up to 2.9 degrees C were found. The spread found in these deviations was comparable, typically 0.5-1.0 degrees C. When applying intramuscle variation to the perfusion, temperature-based optimization proved to be the best strategy in 95% of the evaluated cases applying +/- 50% local variation.
CONCLUSIONS: Temperature-based optimization proves to be superior to SAR-based optimization both under variation of perfusion level as well as under the application of intratissue variation. The spread in achieved temperatures is comparable. These results are valid under the assumption of constant perfusion at hyperthermic levels. Although similar results are expected from models including thermoregulation, additional analysis is required to confirm this. In view of uncertainty in tissue perfusion and other modeling uncertainties, the authors propose feedback guided temperature-based optimization as the best candidate to improve thermal dose delivery during hyperthermia treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20964171     DOI: 10.1118/1.3462561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  Utility of treatment planning for thermochemotherapy treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu Yuan; Kung-Shan Cheng; Oana I Craciunescu; Paul R Stauffer; Paolo F Maccarini; Kavitha Arunachalam; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Mark W Dewhirst; Shiva K Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Benefit of replacing the Sigma-60 by the Sigma-Eye applicator. A Monte Carlo-based uncertainty analysis.

Authors:  R A M Canters; M M Paulides; M Franckena; J W Mens; G C van Rhoon
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review.

Authors:  H Petra Kok; Erik N K Cressman; Wim Ceelen; Christopher L Brace; Robert Ivkov; Holger Grüll; Gail Ter Haar; Peter Wust; Johannes Crezee
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.914

4.  Computation of ultimate SAR amplification factors for radiofrequency hyperthermia in non-uniform body models: impact of frequency and tumour location.

Authors:  Bastien Guérin; Jorge F Villena; Athanasios G Polimeridis; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Luca Daniel; Jacob K White; Bruce R Rosen; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.914

5.  Temperature superposition for fast computation of 3D temperature distributions during optimization and planning of interstitial ultrasound hyperthermia treatments.

Authors:  Vasant A Salgaonkar; Punit Prakash; Chris J Diederich
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 6.  Thermal modelling using discrete vasculature for thermal therapy: A review.

Authors:  H Petra Kok; Johanna Gellermann; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Paul R Stauffer; Jeffrey W Hand; Johannes Crezee
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.914

7.  Generalised polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification for planning MRgLITT procedures.

Authors:  Samuel J Fahrenholtz; R Jason Stafford; Florian Maier; John D Hazle; David Fuentes
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 8.  Integrating Loco-Regional Hyperthermia Into the Current Oncology Practice: SWOT and TOWS Analyses.

Authors:  Niloy R Datta; H Petra Kok; Hans Crezee; Udo S Gaipl; Stephan Bodis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Current state of the art of regional hyperthermia treatment planning: a review.

Authors:  H P Kok; P Wust; P R Stauffer; F Bardati; G C van Rhoon; J Crezee
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Magnetic Hyperthermia and Radiation Therapy: Radiobiological Principles and Current Practice .

Authors:  Spiridon V Spirou; Martina Basini; Alessandro Lascialfari; Claudio Sangregorio; Claudia Innocenti
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.