Literature DB >> 20963854

Defining and modeling known adverse outcome pathways: Domoic acid and neuronal signaling as a case study.

Karen H Watanabe1, Melvin E Andersen, Niladri Basu, Michael J Carvan, Kevin M Crofton, Kerensa A King, Cristina Suñol, Evelyn Tiffany-Castiglioni, Irvin R Schultz.   

Abstract

An adverse outcome pathway (AOP) is a sequence of key events from a molecular-level initiating event and an ensuing cascade of steps to an adverse outcome with population-level significance. To implement a predictive strategy for ecotoxicology, the multiscale nature of an AOP requires computational models to link salient processes (e.g., in chemical uptake, toxicokinetics, toxicodynamics, and population dynamics). A case study with domoic acid was used to demonstrate strategies and enable generic recommendations for developing computational models in an effort to move toward a toxicity testing paradigm focused on toxicity pathway perturbations applicable to ecological risk assessment. Domoic acid, an algal toxin with adverse effects on both wildlife and humans, is a potent agonist for kainate receptors (ionotropic glutamate receptors whose activation leads to the influx of Na(+) and Ca²(+)). Increased Ca²(+) concentrations result in neuronal excitotoxicity and cell death, primarily in the hippocampus, which produces seizures, impairs learning and memory, and alters behavior in some species. Altered neuronal Ca²(+) is a key process in domoic acid toxicity, which can be evaluated in vitro. Furthermore, results of these assays would be amenable to mechanistic modeling for identifying domoic acid concentrations and Ca²(+) perturbations that are normal, adaptive, or clearly toxic. In vitro assays with outputs amenable to measurement in exposed populations can link in vitro to in vivo conditions, and toxicokinetic information will aid in linking in vitro results to the individual organism. Development of an AOP required an iterative process with three important outcomes: a critically reviewed, stressor-specific AOP; identification of key processes suitable for evaluation with in vitro assays; and strategies for model development.
© 2010 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20963854     DOI: 10.1002/etc.373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  16 in total

1.  Application of in silico and in vitro methods in the development of adverse outcome pathway constructs in wildlife.

Authors:  Judith C Madden; Vera Rogiers; Mathieu Vinken
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  FutureTox II: in vitro data and in silico models for predictive toxicology.

Authors:  Thomas B Knudsen; Douglas A Keller; Miriam Sander; Edward W Carney; Nancy G Doerrer; David L Eaton; Suzanne Compton Fitzpatrick; Kenneth L Hastings; Donna L Mendrick; Raymond R Tice; Paul B Watkins; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Eugene Muratov; Denis Fourches; Judy Strickland; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Pyrosequencing-based transcriptomic resources in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis, with a focus on genes involved in molecular response to diquat-induced stress.

Authors:  Anthony Bouétard; Céline Noirot; Anne-Laure Besnard; Olivier Bouchez; Damien Choisne; Eugénie Robe; Christophe Klopp; Laurent Lagadic; Marie-Agnès Coutellec
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Modeling the endocrine control of vitellogenin production in female rainbow trout.

Authors:  Kaitlin Sundling; Gheorghe Craciun; Irvin Schultz; Sharon Hook; James Nagler; Tim Cavileer; Joseph Verducci; Yushi Liu; Jonghan Kim; William Hayton
Journal:  Math Biosci Eng       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.080

Review 6.  Putative adverse outcome pathways relevant to neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Anna Bal-Price; Kevin M Crofton; Magdalini Sachana; Timothy J Shafer; Mamta Behl; Anna Forsby; Alan Hargreaves; Brigitte Landesmann; Pamela J Lein; Jochem Louisse; Florianne Monnet-Tschudi; Alicia Paini; Alexandra Rolaki; André Schrattenholz; Cristina Suñol; Christoph van Thriel; Maurice Whelan; Ellen Fritsche
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.635

7.  Fetal domoic acid exposure affects lateral amygdala neurons, diminishes social investigation and alters sensory-motor gating.

Authors:  D G Zuloaga; G P Lahvis; B Mills; H L Pearce; J Turner; J Raber
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 4.294

8.  Screening the ToxCast phase II libraries for alterations in network function using cortical neurons grown on multi-well microelectrode array (mwMEA) plates.

Authors:  Jenna D Strickland; Matthew T Martin; Ann M Richard; Keith A Houck; Timothy J Shafer
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 9.  Public health risks associated with chronic, low-level domoic acid exposure: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Rebekah Petroff; Alicia Hendrix; Sara Shum; Kimberly S Grant; Kathi A Lefebvre; Thomas M Burbacher
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 12.310

10.  Interactions between chemical and climate stressors: a role for mechanistic toxicology in assessing climate change risks.

Authors:  Michael J Hooper; Gerald T Ankley; Daniel A Cristol; Lindley A Maryoung; Pamela D Noyes; Kent E Pinkerton
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.