Literature DB >> 20963833

Nasal high frequency percussive ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in transient tachypnea of the newborn: a pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT00556738).

Eric Dumas De La Roque1, Clotilde Bertrand, Olivier Tandonnet, Muriel Rebola, Emilie Roquand, Laurent Renesme, Christophe Elleau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether nasal high frequency percussive ventilation (NHFPV) would decrease duration of transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in newborn infants.
METHODS: A prospective, unmasked, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted in 46 eligible newborn infants who were hospitalized for TTN in the University Hospital of Bordeaux (France) between 2007 and 2009. Infants born by cesarian section ≥37 GA, ≥2,000 g with diagnosis of TTN and with a transcutaneous saturation <90% at 20 min after birth were eligible. Infants were randomized to either NHFPV or NCPAP. The primary endpoint was a reduction of the duration of TTN. Secondary endpoints were the duration of oxygen therapy and the minimal level required to obtain a saturation between 90% and 96% integrated into an index which included a time factor: [(FiO2 -21)/time of O2 therapy].
RESULTS: In the NHFPV group the duration of TTN was half the time of NCPAP group (105 min ± 20 and 377 min ± 150, respectively; P < 0.0001). There was a significant decrease in duration of oxygen supplementation in the NHFPV group (6.3 min ± 3.3) compared to the NCPAP group (19.1 min ± 8.1; P < 0.001), and a significant decrease in level of oxygen supplementation [(FiO2 -0.21)/time of O2 therapy] in the NHFPV group (0.29 min(-1)  ± 0.16) compared to the NCPAP group (0.46 min(-1)  ± 0.50; P < 0.001). There was no complication and NHFPV was as well tolerated as NCPAP.
CONCLUSION: NHFPV is well tolerated and more effective than NCPAP in treatment of TTN. NHFPV might be a novel and safe tool to manage TTN. Pediatr Pulmonol.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Transient tachypnea of the newborn; continuous positive airways pressure; high frequency ventilation; intensive care; newborn; non-invasive ventilation; randomized trial; respiratory distress

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20963833     DOI: 10.1002/ppul.21354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol        ISSN: 1099-0496


  10 in total

Review 1.  High-frequency ventilation for non-invasive respiratory support of neonates.

Authors:  Bradley A Yoder; K H Albertine; D M Null
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Nasal high-frequency oscillation ventilation in neonates: a survey in five European countries.

Authors:  Hendrik Stefan Fischer; Kajsa Bohlin; Christoph Bührer; Gerd Schmalisch; Malte Cremer; Irwin Reiss; Christoph Czernik
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Interventions for the management of transient tachypnoea of the newborn - an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Matteo Bruschettini; Karl-Omar Hassan; Olga Romantsik; Rita Banzi; Maria Grazia Calevo; Luca Moresco
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-24

4.  Non-invasive high-frequency ventilation versus bi-phasic continuous positive airway pressure (BP-CPAP) following CPAP failure in infants <1250 g: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A Mukerji; K Sarmiento; B Lee; K Hassall; V Shah
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Chest-MRI under pulsatile flow ventilation: A new promising technique.

Authors:  Catherine Beigelman-Aubry; Nicolas Peguret; Matthias Stuber; Jean Delacoste; Bastien Belmondo; Alban Lovis; Julien Simons; Olivier Long; Kathleen Grant; Gregoire Berchier; Chantal Rohner; Gabriele Bonanno; Simone Coppo; Juerg Schwitter; Mahmut Ozsahin; Salah Qanadli; Reto Meuli; Jean Bourhis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Mechanical Ventilation in Pediatric and Neonatal Patients.

Authors:  Michaela Kollisch-Singule; Harry Ramcharran; Joshua Satalin; Sarah Blair; Louis A Gatto; Penny L Andrews; Nader M Habashi; Gary F Nieman; Adel Bougatef
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  Evaluating Clinical Outcomes and Physiological Perspectives in Studies Investigating Respiratory Support for Babies Born at Term With or at Risk of Transient Tachypnea: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Erin V McGillick; Arjan B Te Pas; Thomas van den Akker; J M H Keus; Marta Thio; Stuart B Hooper
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.569

8.  Non-invasive respiratory support for the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn.

Authors:  Luca Moresco; Olga Romantsik; Maria Grazia Calevo; Matteo Bruschettini
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-17

9.  High-frequency nasal ventilation for 21 d maintains gas exchange with lower respiratory pressures and promotes alveolarization in preterm lambs.

Authors:  Donald M Null; Jeremy Alvord; Wendy Leavitt; Albert Wint; Mar Janna Dahl; Angela P Presson; Robert H Lane; Robert J DiGeronimo; Bradley A Yoder; Kurt H Albertine
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 10.  A Review on Non-invasive Respiratory Support for Management of Respiratory Distress in Extremely Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Yuan Shi; Hemananda Muniraman; Manoj Biniwale; Rangasamy Ramanathan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.418

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.