Literature DB >> 20963432

Ten years experience in the management of borderline ovarian tumors at Tom Baker Cancer Centre.

Nisrin Anfinan1, Khalid Sait, Prafull Ghatage, Jill Nation, Pam Chu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the clinical outcomes of patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) at Tom Baker Cancer Centre (TBCC) and to assess the value of surgical staging.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 138 patients treated for BOTs at TBCC between January 1994 and December 2005. Patients were divided into two groups: group I with complete surgical staging (n = 89) and group II with incomplete surgical staging (n = 49). This population-based study identified patients using the Alberta Cancer Registry. Charts were reviewed by a single person. Data extracted included demographic information and prognostic factors such as age, histological type, laterality of the cyst, presence of microinvasion, and the type of surgical procedure. Data were extracted and entered into a study database for analysis. Overall survival and overall recurrence-free survival of both groups were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors for recurrence were analyzed using Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 138 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 46 years. The median follow-up time was 37 months. The most common histological type of BOT was the serous type found in 70 (50.7%) patients. Microinvasion was identified in four (2.9%) patients. Twelve patients were found to have implants as result of the staging procedure; two of them were invasive implants and both required chemotherapy. Forty-three (31%) patients had conservative surgery and 95 (68.8%) patients had non-conservative surgery. Nine (6.5%) patients experienced recurrence: five (5.6%) patients in group I versus four (8.2%) patients in group II. The presence of microinvasion is the risk factor for recurrence (P = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: The indications for restaging surgery remain controversial, as there was no difference in recurrence rates observed between the study groups. However, surgical staging is important for identifying invasive extraovarian implants that need to be treated with chemotherapy. For patients who have conservative surgery, close- and long-term follow-up is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20963432     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1713-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  10 in total

1.  Ovarian serous surface papillary borderline tumor: characteristic imaging features with clinicopathological correlation.

Authors:  Sung Bin Park; Min-Jeong Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee; Yousun Ko
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Long-term Behavior of Serous Borderline Tumors Subdivided Into Atypical Proliferative Tumors and Noninvasive Low-grade Carcinomas: A Population-based Clinicopathologic Study of 942 Cases.

Authors:  Russell Vang; Charlotte G Hannibal; Jette Junge; Kirsten Frederiksen; Susanne K Kjaer; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  A meta-analysis on the impact of platinum-based adjuvant treatment on the outcome of borderline ovarian tumors with invasive implants.

Authors:  Ines Vasconcelos; Jessica Olschewski; Ioana Braicu; Jalid Sehouli
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-01-19

4.  Unilateral cystectomy and serous histology are associated with relapse in borderline ovarian tumor patients with fertility-sparing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Na Li; Xiu Ming; Zhengyu Li
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating borderline from malignant epithelial tumours of the ovary: pathological correlation.

Authors:  Shu Hui Zhao; Jin Wei Qiang; Guo Fu Zhang; Feng Hua Ma; Song Qi Cai; Hai Ming Li; Li Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Fertility-sparing surgery for young patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs): single institution experience.

Authors:  Rui-Fang Chen; Jun Li; Ting-Ting Zhu; Hai-Lin Yu; Xin Lu
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.234

7.  Salpingo-oophorectomy versus cystectomy in patients with borderline ovarian tumors: a systemic review and meta-analysis on postoperative recurrence and fertility.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Lei Fang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Management of borderline ovarian tumors: A tertiary referral center experience in Egypt.

Authors:  Khaled Gaballa; Mohamed Abdelkhalek; Adel Fathi; Basel Refky; Khaled Belal; Moustafa Elaraby; Mohammad Zuhdy
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-02

9.  Histologic distribution of borderline ovarian tumors worldwide: a systematic review.

Authors:  Taejong Song; Yoo-Young Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Borderline ovarian tumors: a study of 100 cases from a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Ahmet Uysal; Semih Mun; Fatma Uysal; Murat Oztekin; Cem Büyüktosun; Salim Sehirali; Omer Başoğul; Cüneyt E Taner
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2013-06-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.