Literature DB >> 20962880

Environmental modification and niche construction: developing O2 gradients drive the evolution of the Wrinkly Spreader.

Anna Koza1, Olena Moshynets, Wilfred Otten, Andrew J Spiers.   

Abstract

The evolutionary success of the novel Wrinkly Spreader (WS) genotypes in diversifying Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 populations in static liquid microcosms has been attributed to the greater availability of O(2) at the air-liquid (A-L) interface where the WS produces a physically cohesive-class biofilm. However, the importance of O(2) gradients in SBW25 adaptation has never been examined. We have explicitly tested the role of O(2) in evolving populations using microsensor profiling and experiments conducted under high and low O(2) conditions. Initial colonists of static microcosms were found to establish O(2) gradients before significant population growth had occurred, converting a previously homogenous environment into one containing a resource continuum with high and low O(2) regions. These gradients were found to persist for long periods by which time significant numbers of WS had appeared colonising the high O(2) niches. Growth was O(2) limited in static microcosms, but high O(2) conditions like those found near the A-L interface supported greater growth and favoured the emergence of WS-like genotypes. A fitness advantage to biofilm formation was seen under high but not low O(2) conditions, suggesting that the cost of biofilm production could only be offset when O(2) levels above the A-L interface were high. Profiling of mature WS biofilms showed that they also contained high and low O(2) regions. Niches within these may support further diversification and succession of the developing biofilm population. O(2) availability has been found to be a major factor underlying the evolutionary success of the WS genotype in static microcosms and illustrates the importance of this resource continuum in microbial diversification and adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20962880      PMCID: PMC3105741          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2010.156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  31 in total

1.  Adaptive divergence in experimental populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. I. Genetic and phenotypic bases of wrinkly spreader fitness.

Authors:  Andrew J Spiers; Sophie G Kahn; John Bohannon; Michael Travisano; Paul B Rainey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 wrinkly spreader biofilm requires attachment factor, cellulose fibre and LPS interactions to maintain strength and integrity.

Authors:  Andrew J Spiers; Paul B Rainey
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 3.  Adaptive radiation in microbial microcosms.

Authors:  R Craig MacLean
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Character displacement promotes cooperation in bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Michael A Brockhurst; Michael E Hochberg; Thomas Bell; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart; Michael J Franklin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Factors affecting production of cellulose at the air/liquid interface of a culture of Acetobacter xylinum.

Authors:  M SCHRAMM; S HESTRIN
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1954-08

7.  Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment.

Authors:  P B Rainey; M Travisano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-07-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Low-substrate regulated microaerophilic behavior as a stress response of aquatic and soil bacteria.

Authors:  R Mazumder; H C Pinkart; P S Alban; T J Phelps; R E Benoit
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 9.  Oxygen and the spatial structure of microbial communities.

Authors:  Tom Fenchel; Bland Finlay
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2008-09-24

10.  Factors which control maximal growth of bacteria.

Authors:  N A SINCLAIR; J L STOKES
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1962-05       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  19 in total

1.  Facultative control of matrix production optimizes competitive fitness in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 biofilm models.

Authors:  Jonas S Madsen; Yu-Cheng Lin; Georgia R Squyres; Alexa Price-Whelan; Ana de Santiago Torio; Angela Song; William C Cornell; Søren J Sørensen; Joao B Xavier; Lars E P Dietrich
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Competition both drives and impedes diversification in a model adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Susan F Bailey; Jeremy R Dettman; Paul B Rainey; Rees Kassen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Laboratory Evolution of Microbial Interactions in Bacterial Biofilms.

Authors:  Marivic Martin; Theresa Hölscher; Anna Dragoš; Vaughn S Cooper; Ákos T Kovács
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Co-evolution with lytic phage selects for the mucoid phenotype of Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25.

Authors:  Pauline Deirdre Scanlan; Angus Buckling
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Adaptive divergence in experimental populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. V. Insight into the niche specialist fuzzy spreader compels revision of the model Pseudomonas radiation.

Authors:  Gayle C Ferguson; Frederic Bertels; Paul B Rainey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Co-evolution with Staphylococcus aureus leads to lipopolysaccharide alterations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Mikael Tognon; Thilo Köhler; Bartosz G Gdaniec; Youai Hao; Joseph S Lam; Marie Beaume; Alexandre Luscher; Angus Buckling; Christian van Delden
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Crowded growth leads to the spontaneous evolution of semistable coexistence in laboratory yeast populations.

Authors:  Evgeni M Frenkel; Michael J McDonald; J David Van Dyken; Katya Kosheleva; Gregory I Lang; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Experimental evolution in biofilm populations.

Authors:  Hans P Steenackers; Ilse Parijs; Akanksha Dubey; Kevin R Foster; Jozef Vanderleyden
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 9.  Intra-tumor heterogeneity: lessons from microbial evolution and clinical implications.

Authors:  Elza C de Bruin; Tiffany B Taylor; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 10.  A mechanistic explanation linking adaptive mutation, niche change, and fitness advantage for the wrinkly spreader.

Authors:  Andrew J Spiers
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.