Literature DB >> 20962698

Factors explaining children's responses to intravenous needle insertions.

Ann Marie McCarthy1, Charmaine Kleiber, Kirsten Hanrahan, M Bridget Zimmerman, Nina Westhus, Susan Allen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research shows that numerous child, parent, and procedural variables affect children's distress responses to procedures. Cognitive-behavioral interventions such as distraction are effective in reducing pain and distress for many children undergoing these procedures.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this report was to examine child, parent, and procedural variables that explain child distress during a scheduled intravenous insertion when parents are distraction coaches for their children.
METHODS: A total of 542 children, between 4 and 10 years of age, and their parents participated. Child age, gender, diagnosis, and ethnicity were measured by questions developed for this study. Standardized instruments were used to measure child experience with procedures, temperament, ability to attend, anxiety, coping style, and pain sensitivity. Questions were developed to measure parent variables, including ethnicity, gender, previous experiences, and expectations, and procedural variables, including use of topical anesthetics and difficulty of procedure. Standardized instruments were used to measure parenting style and parent anxiety, whereas a new instrument was developed to measure parent performance of distraction. Children's distress responses were measured with the Observation Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised (behavioral), salivary cortisol (biological), Oucher Pain Scale (self-report), and parent report of child distress (parent report). Regression methods were used for data analyses.
RESULTS: Variables explaining behavioral, child-report and parent-report measures include child age, typical coping response, and parent expectation of distress (p < .01). Level of parents' distraction coaching explained a significant portion of behavioral, biological, and parent-report distress measures (p < .05). Child impulsivity and special assistance at school also significantly explained child self-report of pain (p < .05). Additional variables explaining cortisol response were child's distress in the morning before clinic, diagnoses of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or anxiety disorder, and timing of preparation for the clinic visit. DISCUSSION: The findings can be used to identify children at risk for high distress during procedures. This is the first study to find a relationship between child behavioral distress and level of parent distraction coaching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20962698      PMCID: PMC3546606          DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181f80ed5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  42 in total

1.  Liposomal lidocaine to improve procedural success rates and reduce procedural pain among children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anna Taddio; Herpreet Kaur Soin; Suzanne Schuh; Gideon Koren; Dennis Scolnik
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The Perception of Procedures Questionnaire: psychometric properties of a brief parent report measure of procedural distress.

Authors:  A E Kazak; B Penati; M K Waibel; G F Blackall
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  1996-04

3.  Unravelling age effects and sex differences in needle pain: ratings of sensory intensity and unpleasantness of venipuncture pain by children and their parents.

Authors:  B Goodenough; W Thomas; G D Champion; D Perrott; J E Taplin; C L von Baeyer; J B Ziegler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Children's expectations and memories of acute distress: short- and long-term efficacy of pain management interventions.

Authors:  L L Cohen; R L Blount; R J Cohen; C M Ball; C B McClellan; R S Bernard
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2001-09

5.  Parents as distraction coaches during i.v. insertion: a randomized study.

Authors:  C Kleiber; M Craft-Rosenberg; D C Harper
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Parenting and child distress during cancer procedures: a multidimensional assessment.

Authors:  L M Dahlquist; T G Power; C N Cox; D J Fernbach
Journal:  Child Health Care       Date:  1994

Review 7.  Determinants and consequences of children's coping in the medical setting: conceptualization, review, and critique.

Authors:  K D Rudolph; M D Dennig; J R Weisz
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  A typology of pain coping strategies in pediatric patients with chronic abdominal pain.

Authors:  Lynn S Walker; Kari Freeman Baber; Judy Garber; Craig A Smith
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Evaluating instruments for a study on children's responses to a painful procedure when parents are distraction coaches.

Authors:  Charmaine Kleiber; Ann Marie McCarthy
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.145

10.  Sex differences in parent and child pain ratings during an experimental child pain task.

Authors:  E C Moon; C T Chambers; Anne-Claire Larochette; K Hayton; K D Craig; P J McGrath
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.037

View more
  20 in total

1.  Salivary cortisol: a tool for biobehavioral research in children.

Authors:  Margaret F Keil
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.145

2.  Flebogamma(®) 5 % DIF Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Replacement Therapy in Children with Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases.

Authors:  Mark Ballow; Paul J Pinciaro; Timothy Craig; Gary Kleiner; James Moy; Hans D Ochs; John Sleasman; William Smits
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 8.317

3.  Building a computer program to support children, parents, and distraction during healthcare procedures.

Authors:  Kirsten Hanrahan; Ann Marie McCarthy; Charmaine Kleiber; Kaan Ataman; W Nick Street; M Bridget Zimmerman; Anne L Ersig
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 4.  Systematic Review: A Systematic Review of the Interrelationships Among Children's Coping Responses, Children's Coping Outcomes, and Parent Cognitive-Affective, Behavioral, and Contextual Variables in the Needle-Related Procedures Context.

Authors:  Lauren Campbell; Miranda DiLorenzo; Nicole Atkinson; Rebecca Pillai Riddell
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2017-07-01

5.  Impact of Parent-Provided Distraction on Child Responses to an IV Insertion.

Authors:  Ann Marie McCarthy; Charmaine Kleiber; Kirsten Hanrahan; M Bridget Zimmerman; Nina Westhus; Susan Allen
Journal:  Child Health Care       Date:  2010

6.  Matching doses of distraction with child risk for distress during a medical procedure: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ann Marie McCarthy; Charmaine Kleiber; Kirsten Hanrahan; M Bridget Zimmerman; Anne Ersig; Nina Westhus; Susan Allen
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Salivary cortisol responsivity to an intravenous catheter insertion in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Ann Marie McCarthy; Kirsten Hanrahan; Latisha Myers Scott; Nancy Zemblidge; Charmaine Kleiber; M Bridget Zimmerman
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2011-03-09

8.  [Non-pharmaceutical measures, topical analgesics and oral administration of glucose in pain management: Austrian interdisciplinary recommendations on pediatric perioperative pain management].

Authors:  B Messerer; B Krauss-Stoisser; B Urlesberger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Validation of a clinically useful measure of children's state anxiety before medical procedures.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Charmaine Kleiber; Ann Marie McCarthy; Kirsten Hanrahan
Journal:  J Spec Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 1.260

10.  Genetic Variants and the Cortisol Response in Children: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Debra L Schutte; Jennifer Standley; Elizabeth J Leslie; Bridget Zimmerman; Kirsten Hanrahan; Jeffrey C Murray; Ann Marie McCarthy
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.