Literature DB >> 20962682

Effects of fatigue on muscle stiffness and intermittent sprinting during cycling.

Massimiliano Ditroilo1, Mark Watsford, Eneko Fernández-Peña, Giancarlo D'Amen, Francesco Lucertini, Giuseppe De Vito.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It was recently demonstrated that musculoarticular (MA) stiffness is related to sprint cycling performance in nonfatigued conditions. This study examined whether relatively stiffer cyclists were more effective at sprinting under fatigued conditions, as occurs during endurance cycling competitions.
METHODS: MA stiffness of the quadriceps was assessed in 21 trained male cyclists (28.7 ± 9.5 yr, 1.74 ± 0.08 m, 67.5 ± 7.2 kg). Participants also performed a maximal 6-s sprint on a cycle ergometer to assess peak power output (POpeak), peak crank torque (CTpeak), and peak rate of crank torque development (RCTDpeak). A cycling fatigue protocol then required cyclists to pedal at 30%, 35%, and 40% of POpeak and sprint at the end of each stage. Surface EMG was recorded from vastus lateralis during each sprint and analyzed in the time domain as integrated EMG (iEMG) and in the frequency domain as instantaneous median frequency (MDF) adopting a continuous wavelet transform. Participants were then retested for MA stiffness.
RESULTS: MA stiffness (-12%) was significantly reduced after the cycling protocol. Further, POpeak, CTpeak, RCTDpeak, and iEMG were reduced by 20%, 15%, 13%, and 20%, respectively, after the fatigue protocol (P<0.05). When the cyclists were divided into relatively stiff (SG) and relatively compliant groups (CG), only SG exhibited significant decreases in MA stiffness, CTpeak, RCTDpeak (P<0.05), and instantaneous MDF (R=0.705).
CONCLUSIONS: Whereas neuromechanical parameters were generally reduced under conditions of fatigue, stiff and compliant cyclists were affected differently, with the sprint abilities of SG decreased to the level of CG. It seems important for endurance cyclists to incorporate training strategies to maintain MA stiffness during competition to offset declines in sprint performance.
© 2011 by the American College of Sports Medicine

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20962682     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182012261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  7 in total

Review 1.  Assessing musculo-articular stiffness using free oscillations: theory, measurement and analysis.

Authors:  Massimiliano Ditroilo; Mark Watsford; Aron Murphy; Giuseppe De Vito
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Hot conditions improve power output during repeated cycling sprints without modifying neuromuscular fatigue characteristics.

Authors:  Olivier Girard; D J Bishop; S Racinais
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Sources of variability in musculo-articular stiffness measurement.

Authors:  Massimiliano Ditroilo; Mark Watsford; Aron Murphy; Giuseppe De Vito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Tensiomyographical responsiveness to peripheral fatigue in quadriceps femoris.

Authors:  Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín; Francesc Medina-Mirapeix; José Casaña-Granell; José A García-Vidal; Carmen Lillo-Navarro; Josep C Benítez-Martínez
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Immediate effect of patellar kinesiology tape application on quadriceps peak moment following muscle fatigue: A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Young-Jin Son; Jung-Hoon Lee; Im-Rak Choi
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.041

6.  Characteristics of Pedaling Muscle Stiffness among Cyclists of Different Performance Levels.

Authors:  Isaac López-Laval; Rafel Cirer-Sastre; Francisco Corbi; Sebastian Sitko
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Muscle Recovery after a Single Bout of Functional Fitness Training.

Authors:  Pablo García-Fernández; Eduardo Cimadevilla; Jesús Guodemar-Pérez; Ana María Cañuelo-Márquez; Juan Ramón Heredia-Elvar; Tomás Fernández-Rodríguez; María Del Carmen Lozano-Estevan; Juan Pablo Hervás-Pérez; María Aránzazu Sánchez-Calabuig; Manuel Vicente Garnacho-Castaño; Juan Hernández Lougedo; José Luis Maté-Muñoz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.